Google Takes Position in Controversial Vaccine Safety Debate
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Google Takes Position in Controversial Vaccine Safety Debate
#2this article is bias, google is removing dangerous sites that spread lies and misinformation.
being pro vaccine is the scientific standard, only people who believe in conspiracy will subscribe to these ideas.
example;
"that could be an act of EVIL if it finally turns out that there is truth in the arguments that the current vaccine schedule is severely miss-reporting the cases of brain damage and death caused by adverse reactions."
this is such a ridiculous argument, "if it finally..there is truth" basically admits to lack of evidence/cherry picking.
not only that, the whole point about "severely miss-reporting the cases of brain damage and death caused by adverse reactions." is such a blatant lie, vaccines are seriously one of the most studied things we do, and there is no evidence of vaccines causing brain damage, expect when the person faints and the fall leads to damage.
Anti-vaccine is anti-humanity.
Re: Google Takes Position in Controversial Vaccine Safety Debate
#3this article is bias, google is removing dangerous sites that spread lies and misinformation. being pro vaccine is the scientific standard, only people who believe in conspiracy will subscribe to these ideas. example; "that could be an act of EVIL if it finally turns out that there is truth in the arguments that the current vaccine schedule is severely miss-reporting the cases of brain damage and death caused by adve…
Just curious, have you read much into the subject? rather than having a cursory knowledge on the subject... Hint. if you do, you might start getting more concerned and be less trusting.
Re: Google Takes Position in Controversial Vaccine Safety Debate
#4this article is bias, google is removing dangerous sites that spread lies and misinformation. being pro vaccine is the scientific standard, only people who believe in conspiracy will subscribe to these ideas. example; "that could be an act of EVIL if it finally turns out that there is truth in the arguments that the current vaccine schedule is severely miss-reporting the cases of brain damage and death caused by adve…
Just curious, have you read much into the subject? rather than having a cursory knowledge on the subject... Hint. if you do, you might start getting more concerned and be less trusting.
Have you got some handy links?
Re: Google Takes Position in Controversial Vaccine Safety Debate
#5Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just curious, have you read much into the subject? rather than having a cursory knowledge on the subject... Hint. if you do, you might start getting more concerned and be less trusting.
Have you got some handy links?
IN THE ARticle linked above if you care to click through to the internal links in the article you will get some interesting wider information. However. The important part of the article is not that vaccines have un acknowledged safety issues or not but that google have decided to take a position. That leads to google taking a position in any topical subject right?
Re: Google Takes Position in Controversial Vaccine Safety Debate
#6this article is bias, google is removing dangerous sites that spread lies and misinformation. being pro vaccine is the scientific standard, only people who believe in conspiracy will subscribe to these ideas. example; "that could be an act of EVIL if it finally turns out that there is truth in the arguments that the current vaccine schedule is severely miss-reporting the cases of brain damage and death caused by adve…
I don’t think these people would classify themselves as “anti vaccine”, they would classify as “safe vaccine advocates”. That’s the open question which has real science begging this question.
But that is not the point of that article which is about whether google should be engaging in scientific disputes, political disputes, etc.
Re: Google Takes Position in Controversial Vaccine Safety Debate
#7this article is bias, google is removing dangerous sites that spread lies and misinformation. being pro vaccine is the scientific standard, only people who believe in conspiracy will subscribe to these ideas. example; "that could be an act of EVIL if it finally turns out that there is truth in the arguments that the current vaccine schedule is severely miss-reporting the cases of brain damage and death caused by adve…
I don’t think these people would classify themselves as “anti vaccine”, they would classify as “safe vaccine advocates”. That’s the open question which has real science begging this question. But that is not the point of that article which is about whether google should be engaging in scientific disputes, political disputes, etc.
Vaccines are already safe, to the best of our testing.
Google is a private service, and in theory could censor anything they wanted.
Anti-vaccine isn't just a joke, but a serious threat to the survivability of the human race.