Stanford CS Education Library (2001)
cslibrary.stanford.edu
Stanford CS Education Library (2001)
1–10 of 15 posts
Re: Stanford CS Education Library (2001)
#2Dead Link Checker:
whole site: http://cslibrary.stanford.edu/ 100% scanned - 116/116 URLs checked, 98 OK, 18 failed
root page: http://cslibrary.stanford.edu/ 100% scanned - 28/28 URLs checked, 24 OK, 4 failed
18 dead links on single-page site with 4 dead on the homepage. I'm curious what's the threshold of dead links for considering a site "abandoned."
Re: Stanford CS Education Library (2001)
#3Dead Link Checker: whole site: http://cslibrary.stanford.edu/ 100% scanned - 116/116 URLs checked, 98 OK, 18 failed root page: http://cslibrary.stanford.edu/ 100% scanned - 28/28 URLs checked, 24 OK, 4 failed 18 dead links on single-page site with 4 dead on the homepage. I'm curious what's the threshold of dead links for considering a site "abandoned."
FWIW the Binky Pointer videos are available on Youtube.
Re: Stanford CS Education Library (2001)
#4[deleted]
Re: Stanford CS Education Library (2001)
#5Why is this being posted? I suppose it's interesting from a historical perspective, for what is available. This is so far removed from modern CS Ed that it's an interesting little time capsule, I guess.
Re: Stanford CS Education Library (2001)
#6Why is this being posted? I suppose it's interesting from a historical perspective, for what is available. This is so far removed from modern CS Ed that it's an interesting little time capsule, I guess.
I think modern CS could benefit from more claymation videos.
Re: Stanford CS Education Library (2001)
#7Why is this being posted? I suppose it's interesting from a historical perspective, for what is available. This is so far removed from modern CS Ed that it's an interesting little time capsule, I guess.
In what way? I learned about all this stuff a few years ago in school. Yeah there's more stuff to learn about now but the basics never change.
Re: Stanford CS Education Library (2001)
#8Why is this being posted? I suppose it's interesting from a historical perspective, for what is available. This is so far removed from modern CS Ed that it's an interesting little time capsule, I guess.
because it is interesting, and because the knowledge in it while old is still relevant.
Re: Stanford CS Education Library (2001)
#9Why is this being posted? I suppose it's interesting from a historical perspective, for what is available. This is so far removed from modern CS Ed that it's an interesting little time capsule, I guess.
I upvoted it as it was interesting to me.
Re: Stanford CS Education Library (2001)
#10There oughta be a visual/conceptual explanation textbook for Rust borrowing, traits and types because some of it is confusing and/or ambiguous.