Live data from Hacker News

To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public

bloomberg.com

1–10 of 630 posts

Re: To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public

#5

If DuckDuckGo can change their stupid name they will gain market share overnight.

Because “Google” was a sensible name?

No, but Google is two syllables, and DDG is three. Also, Google doesn't have a duck in the name.

Re: To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public

#7
I don’t see any mention in this article of what seems like the most obvious way to split up Google, separating their search and ad businesses. (Edit to add: although maybe the effect would end up being similar, if API users serve their own ads but without access to Google’s ad infrastructure.)

That obviously wouldn’t be a simple job, of course, and maybe there are some interesting reasons why it wouldn’t work well.

Re: To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public

#8

I don’t want to break Google’s monopoly on search. Google’s search is fantastic. It’s their advertising business knowing too much about me I care about.

Google treads on censorship as it regards political discourse. I’m not referring to things beyond the pale. I mean they will censor seemingly small things like bury a politician’s peccadilloes or surface something that stains an opponent. That’s dangerous.

One obvious search query string is: reddit + candidate and see some surfaced and some less so.

Re: To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public

#10

I don’t want to break Google’s monopoly on search. Google’s search is fantastic. It’s their advertising business knowing too much about me I care about.

If you want Google search without tracking, you should try StartPage

https://www.startpage.com/

Post reply on HN