Google exec responds to Project Veritas video about bias
1–10 of 52 posts
Re: Google exec responds to Project Veritas video about bias
#2For context, this is the report she’s talking about: https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/06/24/insider-blows-whis...
Re: Google exec responds to Project Veritas video about bias
#3For context, this is the report she’s talking about: https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/06/24/insider-blows-whis...
Reminds me of the Planned Parenthood hatchet job.
Re: Google exec responds to Project Veritas video about bias
#4For context, this is the report she’s talking about: https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/06/24/insider-blows-whis...
Reminds me of the Planned Parenthood hatchet job.
Also that time O'Keefe and co edited a speech about racial tolerance and solidarity among impoverished farmers to make it seem like the speaker was advocating racism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firing_of_Shirley_Sherrod
Veritas has been caught doing this exact type of numerous times, and why anyone would consider them to be a credible source of information beggers belief. Hell they even refer to themselves as an intelligence agency.
https://theintercept.com/2019/05/03/erik-prince-trump-uae-pr...
Re: Google exec responds to Project Veritas video about bias
#5meh only matter of time until this sort of propaganda idealism is the norm across the valley. lots of sjws justify banning various actors as the right of the private corp. this again falls into that same purview. they can show you whatever selected by an ai trained on whatever rules for whatever social agenda they wish to push -- this has been going on for over a cenury. social engineering becomes more explicit than implicit.
Re: Google exec responds to Project Veritas video about bias
#6Re: Google exec responds to Project Veritas video about bias
#7meh only matter of time until this sort of propaganda idealism is the norm across the valley. lots of sjws justify banning various actors as the right of the private corp. this again falls into that same purview. they can show you whatever selected by an ai trained on whatever rules for whatever social agenda they wish to push -- this has been going on for over a cenury. social engineering becomes more explicit than…
They've been doing AI training for a century? Wow, this goes deeper than I thought.
Oh, oh no, wait. This the plot to Bay's first Transformers movie.
Re: Google exec responds to Project Veritas video about bias
#8meh only matter of time until this sort of propaganda idealism is the norm across the valley. lots of sjws justify banning various actors as the right of the private corp. this again falls into that same purview. they can show you whatever selected by an ai trained on whatever rules for whatever social agenda they wish to push -- this has been going on for over a cenury. social engineering becomes more explicit than…
They've been doing AI training for a century? Wow, this goes deeper than I thought. Oh, oh no, wait. This the plot to Bay's first Transformers movie.
This is replacing editorial control.
See century of self.
Re: Google exec responds to Project Veritas video about bias
#9For context, this is the report she’s talking about: https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/06/24/insider-blows-whis...
Reminds me of the Planned Parenthood hatchet job.
You call that a "hatchet job" after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, through an independent forensics review, found[0] the videos to be "authentic and not deceptively edited?"
The case involved the Texas Health and Human Services Commission decision to terminate the state’s Medicaid provider agreements with PP affiliates across the state, based in large part on those very videos.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed that decision in January of this year, which directly refutes your "hatchet job" claim against the video footage in which Planned Parenthood executives admitted to illegally altering abortion procedures to obtain intact fetuses whose organs could be sold to medical research firms for greater profit, and how they found ways to circumvent the federal ban on partial-birth abortion?
If that is what this reminds you of, well...
[0] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1D8GgSTArPinJ6SH8ITRgjkYqNq6...
Re: Google exec responds to Project Veritas video about bias
#10I'm no fan of James O'Keefe, but some of the direct quotes are much more incriminating than this response makes them out to be:
> “Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.”
She may have "used some imprecise language" but I have no doubt that many Google employees do indeed feel like they should use their company's influence to prevent "the next Trump situation."
Also, there's no way she wrote this on her own. Google's PR machine is very proactive, and the enormous collection of messages she received when she landed undoubtedly included a stern warning not to say anything more in public. She may have written part of this, but at the very least it was a team effort.