Live data from Hacker News

Towards Reproducible Research with PyTorch Hub

pytorch.org

1–5 of 5 posts

Re: Towards Reproducible Research with PyTorch Hub

#3
I love that the tooling for ML experimentation is becoming more mature. Keeping track of hyperparameters, training/validation/test experiment test set manifests, code state, etc is both extremely crucial and extremely necessary. I can't count how many times I've trained a great model only to lose the exact state and be unable to reproduce it. It's extremely frustrating. When I found sacred (https://github.com/IDSIA/sacred) it changed my team's workflow in a very positive way. We already have this approach of saving default experiment workbenche images, but formalizing it is much nicer.

Re: Towards Reproducible Research with PyTorch Hub

#4
post #3

I love that the tooling for ML experimentation is becoming more mature. Keeping track of hyperparameters, training/validation/test experiment test set manifests, code state, etc is both extremely crucial and extremely necessary. I can't count how many times I've trained a great model only to lose the exact state and be unable to reproduce it. It's extremely frustrating. When I found sacred ( https://github.com/IDSIA/…

sacred is interesting. how does it compare to MLflow?

Re: Towards Reproducible Research with PyTorch Hub

#5
This is like an app store of ml models which is pretty cool. There are a couple of tooling around ML that more of compliments the above than being redundant.

-- Open Source --

Mlflow : https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow

Polyaxon : https://github.com/polyaxon/polyaxon

Modelchimp(mine): https://github.com/ModelChimp/modelchimp

ModelDB : https://github.com/mitdbg/modeldb

Sacred : https://github.com/IDSIA/sacred

-- Non open source --

Cometml : https://www.comet.ml/

Weights and Biases : https://www.wandb.com/

MissinglinkAi : https://missinglink.ai/