No, Night Owls Aren’t Doomed to Die Early
nytimes.com
No, Night Owls Aren’t Doomed to Die Early
1–10 of 54 posts
Re: No, Night Owls Aren’t Doomed to Die Early
#2Re: No, Night Owls Aren’t Doomed to Die Early
#3[flagged]
Note one of the words there. I think I logged in like 5 years ago.
Re: No, Night Owls Aren’t Doomed to Die Early
#4Re: No, Night Owls Aren’t Doomed to Die Early
#5Re: No, Night Owls Aren’t Doomed to Die Early
#6Re: No, Night Owls Aren’t Doomed to Die Early
#7[flagged]
Re: No, Night Owls Aren’t Doomed to Die Early
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Create a free account" Note one of the words there. I think I logged in like 5 years ago.
I'm not interested in handing out my email address to read an article, and I would expect most HN users feel the same way.
We don't need more advertising-backed or bankroll-backed journalism just to save you 10 seconds of convenience which I see HNers also complain about all the time.
Re: No, Night Owls Aren’t Doomed to Die Early
#9News sites have picked it up and produced headlines on the same study with the complete opposite sentiment: https://news.sky.com/story/nocturnal-night-owls-risk-early-d...
My understanding is from the article that night owls are not doomed to die early in the literal sense, but not being able to work, eat and exercise in the "proper time" still makes them susceptible to diabetes, neurological, respiratory and cardiovascular problems, etc.
So yeah, still doomed.
Re: No, Night Owls Aren’t Doomed to Die Early
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Create a free account" Note one of the words there. I think I logged in like 5 years ago.
or "New Private Window" (Ctrl-alt-N)