Satoshi Nakamoto
medium.com
Satoshi Nakamoto
1–4 of 4 posts
Re: Satoshi Nakamoto
#2It’s just strange - there was a reason to keep the founder of bitcoin private and now all of a sudden there is a reason this person claiming to be satoshi.
? What’s that reason
Re: Satoshi Nakamoto
#3If he is Satoshi, sign a message with an early block, one mined in the first 6 months and I will believe him, until then I don't.
The important bit is that it doesn't matter anyway, Satoshi Nakamoto was the inventor or creator but he is not the controller. If Craig is Satoshi and he envisages a different type of bitcoin then so be it, but if he created bitcoin then he did so knowing that he could not control it once it was released.
Perhaps he thinks he can move value from bitcoin to bitcoin SV but if he really wanted to destroy bitcoin and create a replacement then he would just need to move all of Satoshis mined bitcoin to an exchange, that movement alone would crash the price even if he didnt sell any himself, but perhaps that may also destroy bitcoin SV because as a fork he would own the same amount of bitcoin SV and could do the same to that fork at any point.
Re: Satoshi Nakamoto
#4It seems more likely than what he's trying to do is pump his BCH SV coin.
There are easy ways to prove that someone is Satoshi Nakamoto and unless I see one, anyone claiming they are without providing proof is just a liar.
For instance, CZ, the CEO of Binance said the following :
"The real Satoshi can digitally sign any message to prove it. This is as simple as breathing for him/her. And we have the pub key.
Until then, everyone is Satoshi, except Craig Wright!"