Facebook are 'morally bankrupt, pathological liars' – NZ Privacy Commissioner
1–10 of 13 posts
Re: Facebook are 'morally bankrupt, pathological liars' – NZ Privacy Commissioner
#2Re: Facebook are 'morally bankrupt, pathological liars' – NZ Privacy Commissioner
#3Re: Facebook are 'morally bankrupt, pathological liars' – NZ Privacy Commissioner
#4Re: Facebook are 'morally bankrupt, pathological liars' – NZ Privacy Commissioner
#5Re: Facebook are 'morally bankrupt, pathological liars' – NZ Privacy Commissioner
#6Re: Facebook are 'morally bankrupt, pathological liars' – NZ Privacy Commissioner
#7So I'm going to guess that this has little to do with privacy, and is instead about Facebook being insufficiently compliant with state requests for content control and/or surveillance.
How did I do?
Re: Facebook are 'morally bankrupt, pathological liars' – NZ Privacy Commissioner
#8- From which one?
- From any
Re: Facebook are 'morally bankrupt, pathological liars' – NZ Privacy Commissioner
#9I mean this is a country that made distributing the NZ shooter manifesto a harsher crime (up to 14 years in jail) then distributing child porn (up to 10 years).
Source: https://globalnews.ca/news/5087363/new-zealand-manifesto-ban... https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&object...
Re: Facebook are 'morally bankrupt, pathological liars' – NZ Privacy Commissioner
#10> "Facebook cannot be trusted. They are morally bankrupt pathological liars..."
Sure.
> "...who enable genocide (Myanmar), facilitate foreign undermining of democratic institutions, .... [They] allow the live streaming of suicides, rapes, and murders, continue to host and publish the mosque attack video, allow advertisers to target 'Jew haters' and other hateful market segments, and refuse to accept any responsibility for any content or harm."
I feel this is making making moral statements with great symbolic value, rather than suggesting anything with any serious practical understanding.
The article features paragraphs complaining that the obscene video is still up, but doesn't seem to understand the internet allows anti-censorship behaviour. I'd guess that FB already disallows uploading the video, but the ones which get through what the NZ Privacy Commissioner calls "the AI" must have been modified in some way.
I don't necessarily mind mainstream media (who are so influenced by FB's control over distribution) having a go at Facebook. But, a politician complaining that FB isn't doing a good enough job at censoring what's already illegal for people in NZ to consume raises flags for me.