Live data from Hacker News

The Chinese media model

china-underground.com

1–10 of 53 posts

Re: The Chinese media model

#2
I'm always amused by the indignation expressed by people when some nation other than their own is shown to be using their resources to to exert international influence. The British Empire did. The USSR did. The United States does. Of course China does too.

Re: The Chinese media model

#3
Speaking of propaganda, can we talk about how good the movies Wolf Warrior and Wolf Warrior 2 is? Both films feature Chinese military protagonists and both films feature western villains.

These films remind me of Rambo even including the jingoistic pro-nation-of-origin message.

I think the international market accepted Rambo because they thought USA was cool. I wonder if we will find ourselves consuming “Chinakana” (riff on “Americana”) when we think China is “cool.”

Re: The Chinese media model

#4
post #2

I'm always amused by the indignation expressed by people when some nation other than their own is shown to be using their resources to to exert international influence. The British Empire did. The USSR did. The United States does. Of course China does too.

Right but not all reflect the same principles.

If you want to jump on the China principles bandwagon that’s your right, but you have to realize the principles allow for different outcomes, some more or less universal or inclusive or exclusive.

Put another way, would you propose the US (or Europe) adopt Chinese styled principles and use their influence to project them? Would that be a good thing?

Re: The Chinese media model

#5

Speaking of propaganda, can we talk about how good the movies Wolf Warrior and Wolf Warrior 2 is? Both films feature Chinese military protagonists and both films feature western villains. These films remind me of Rambo even including the jingoistic pro-nation-of-origin message. I think the international market accepted Rambo because they thought USA was cool. I wonder if we will find ourselves consuming “Chinakana” (…

Ignoring whether good or bad they will be “cool” wherever they project power and influence.

Re: The Chinese media model

#6

Speaking of propaganda, can we talk about how good the movies Wolf Warrior and Wolf Warrior 2 is? Both films feature Chinese military protagonists and both films feature western villains. These films remind me of Rambo even including the jingoistic pro-nation-of-origin message. I think the international market accepted Rambo because they thought USA was cool. I wonder if we will find ourselves consuming “Chinakana” (…

Mass facial-recognition surveillance, so hot right now.

Re: The Chinese media model

#7

Speaking of propaganda, can we talk about how good the movies Wolf Warrior and Wolf Warrior 2 is? Both films feature Chinese military protagonists and both films feature western villains. These films remind me of Rambo even including the jingoistic pro-nation-of-origin message. I think the international market accepted Rambo because they thought USA was cool. I wonder if we will find ourselves consuming “Chinakana” (…

Rambo isn't pro-USA is it? Surely It's the story of man fucked over by his country, and the opposite of what you're saying?

Re: The Chinese media model

#8
post #2

I'm always amused by the indignation expressed by people when some nation other than their own is shown to be using their resources to to exert international influence. The British Empire did. The USSR did. The United States does. Of course China does too.

And what, we shouldn't care because of that?

Re: The Chinese media model

#9
I cannot access this website (from London). I get "Web server is down" and ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT.

Since people are upvoting and commenting, can someone share this article?

Re: The Chinese media model

#10
post #2

I'm always amused by the indignation expressed by people when some nation other than their own is shown to be using their resources to to exert international influence. The British Empire did. The USSR did. The United States does. Of course China does too.

I can't even begin to relate to this point of view. Why does everything have to be side-taking, where nobody is allowed to be accused of anything if somebody else, now or in the past, has committed even just the same genre of crime? And why the smug "amused" line? To me, it's all terribly demoralizing.
Post reply on HN