Marketing the myth of serotonin, the ‘happy chemical’ (2015)
theglobeandmail.com
Marketing the myth of serotonin, the ‘happy chemical’ (2015)
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Marketing the myth of serotonin, the ‘happy chemical’ (2015)
#2Re: Marketing the myth of serotonin, the ‘happy chemical’ (2015)
#3But then there is so much wrong here it's hard to know where to begin. I'll go with the basics though: The article relies primarily on two doctors, one who is at odds with the consensus in the field and another based on an editorial, not a peer-reviewed piece of research.
In fact, peer reviewed research directly contradicts some of the opinions, such as stating it's unknown if SSRI medications raise or lower serotonin. It is known, they do raise it [0] (and many other pieces of research to support this)
Undoubtedly pharmaceutical companies have made quite a bit of serotonin and drugs that influence it, but calling serotonin a "myth" is, at best, overreach and at worst click-bait.
Re: Marketing the myth of serotonin, the ‘happy chemical’ (2015)
#4Re: Marketing the myth of serotonin, the ‘happy chemical’ (2015)
#5"30+ years of psychopharm texts and not a single mention of "chemical imbalance". If you are reading a book that includes that term - burn it. It was written by an antipsychiatrist." https://twitter.com/dawso007/status/1108920829344186368
I'm sure it's comforting for the tweet author to pretend that harmful concepts come exclusively from outside his profession, but that's just not true.
Re: Marketing the myth of serotonin, the ‘happy chemical’ (2015)
#6Modern medicine is all about ignoring root causes and prescribing to mask symptoms.