What has Adobe actually done for HTML5 lately?
blogs.adobe.com
What has Adobe actually done for HTML5 lately?
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: What has Adobe actually done for HTML5 lately?
#2Re: What has Adobe actually done for HTML5 lately?
#3I actually had no idea that Adobe has been working with so much HTML5-related technology, but Flash still really has to go for 99 percent of the web.
I think you are saying it’s inappropriate 99% of the time. If so, I agree.
(But if you are alluding to Adobe’s frequent claims of a 99% install base, my own stats indicate that only 95% of visitors have Flash 9 or newer installed.)
⁂
And the “Adobe doesn’t fully support HTML5” meme is hardly a canard: http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1265967771&count=1
Re: What has Adobe actually done for HTML5 lately?
#4I actually had no idea that Adobe has been working with so much HTML5-related technology, but Flash still really has to go for 99 percent of the web.
> but Flash still really has to go for 99 percent of the web. I think you are saying it’s inappropriate 99% of the time. If so, I agree. (But if you are alluding to Adobe’s frequent claims of a 99% install base, my own stats indicate that only 95% of visitors have Flash 9 or newer installed.) ⁂ And the “Adobe doesn’t fully support HTML5” meme is hardly a canard: http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1265967771&count=1 comments:…
Their biggest mistake was in buying Macromedia and trying to make Flash the Pantone of the web, instead of furthering the tools. It's the same thing as Microsoft when they tried to make an "open" document standard, which they naturally had inside- and first-knowledge of impending standard changes before their competitors.
Re: What has Adobe actually done for HTML5 lately?
#5I actually had no idea that Adobe has been working with so much HTML5-related technology, but Flash still really has to go for 99 percent of the web.
Re: What has Adobe actually done for HTML5 lately?
#6I actually had no idea that Adobe has been working with so much HTML5-related technology, but Flash still really has to go for 99 percent of the web.
The operative here is "with" (compared to the title's "for"). There are a few clear exceptions though (jQuery, TypeKit, etc).
Re: What has Adobe actually done for HTML5 lately?
#7Re: What has Adobe actually done for HTML5 lately?
#8I actually had no idea that Adobe has been working with so much HTML5-related technology, but Flash still really has to go for 99 percent of the web.
> but Flash still really has to go for 99 percent of the web. I think you are saying it’s inappropriate 99% of the time. If so, I agree. (But if you are alluding to Adobe’s frequent claims of a 99% install base, my own stats indicate that only 95% of visitors have Flash 9 or newer installed.) ⁂ And the “Adobe doesn’t fully support HTML5” meme is hardly a canard: http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1265967771&count=1 comments:…
Re: What has Adobe actually done for HTML5 lately?
#9Re: What has Adobe actually done for HTML5 lately?
#10I actually had no idea that Adobe has been working with so much HTML5-related technology, but Flash still really has to go for 99 percent of the web.
> but Flash still really has to go for 99 percent of the web. I think you are saying it’s inappropriate 99% of the time. If so, I agree. (But if you are alluding to Adobe’s frequent claims of a 99% install base, my own stats indicate that only 95% of visitors have Flash 9 or newer installed.) ⁂ And the “Adobe doesn’t fully support HTML5” meme is hardly a canard: http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1265967771&count=1 comments:…