Bitbucket Pipes
bitbucket.org
Bitbucket Pipes
1–10 of 41 posts
Re: Bitbucket Pipes
#2Seems like a smart move for Atlassian. Still no dominant CI cloud provider.
Re: Bitbucket Pipes
#3Looks great! Is this a validation for GitHub Actions? Trying to understand whether Actions have been getting traction
Re: Bitbucket Pipes
#4Anyone getting an HTTP 403 response?
Re: Bitbucket Pipes
#5Anyone getting an HTTP 403 response?
Yep.
Re: Bitbucket Pipes
#6Looks great! Is this a validation for GitHub Actions? Trying to understand whether Actions have been getting traction
Gitlab has had fully integrated CI for a long time, and there's a clear benefit to integrating it rather than just providing hooks.
Re: Bitbucket Pipes
#7Looks great! Is this a validation for GitHub Actions? Trying to understand whether Actions have been getting traction
Gitlab has had fully integrated CI for a long time, and there's a clear benefit to integrating it rather than just providing hooks.
Bitbucket has had CI too, with bitbucket pipelines. I think the innovation here is the UI not the idea of CI.
Re: Bitbucket Pipes
#8Seems like a smart move for Atlassian. Still no dominant CI cloud provider.
Yeah, Travis and CircleCI are okay but there's still plenty of reasons to run your own.
Re: Bitbucket Pipes
#9Anyone getting an HTTP 403 response?
Hi I'm from the Bitbucket product team. We're looking into it, but as a workaround if you refresh the page it should load properly.