An Anti-Facebook Manifesto, by an Early Facebook Investor
1–10 of 133 posts
Re: An Anti-Facebook Manifesto, by an Early Facebook Investor
#2The huge influx of money into research (here AI, but could be anything in the future) combined with the disfunctions of academia is very troubling.
Re: An Anti-Facebook Manifesto, by an Early Facebook Investor
#3What I struggle to understand is how could esteemed AI researchers like LeCun and many others work for such a company to give it even more powers and edge? How can they justify this as scientists? The huge influx of money into research (here AI, but could be anything in the future) combined with the disfunctions of academia is very troubling.
Re: An Anti-Facebook Manifesto, by an Early Facebook Investor
#4What I struggle to understand is how could esteemed AI researchers like LeCun and many others work for such a company to give it even more powers and edge? How can they justify this as scientists? The huge influx of money into research (here AI, but could be anything in the future) combined with the disfunctions of academia is very troubling.
Re: An Anti-Facebook Manifesto, by an Early Facebook Investor
#5What I struggle to understand is how could esteemed AI researchers like LeCun and many others work for such a company to give it even more powers and edge? How can they justify this as scientists? The huge influx of money into research (here AI, but could be anything in the future) combined with the disfunctions of academia is very troubling.
Re: An Anti-Facebook Manifesto, by an Early Facebook Investor
#6What I struggle to understand is how could esteemed AI researchers like LeCun and many others work for such a company to give it even more powers and edge? How can they justify this as scientists? The huge influx of money into research (here AI, but could be anything in the future) combined with the disfunctions of academia is very troubling.
Re: An Anti-Facebook Manifesto, by an Early Facebook Investor
#7What I struggle to understand is how could esteemed AI researchers like LeCun and many others work for such a company to give it even more powers and edge? How can they justify this as scientists? The huge influx of money into research (here AI, but could be anything in the future) combined with the disfunctions of academia is very troubling.
Even if he refuse to work with fb, pretty sure a lot of other people will be happy to replace.
Re: An Anti-Facebook Manifesto, by an Early Facebook Investor
#8Re: An Anti-Facebook Manifesto, by an Early Facebook Investor
#9What I struggle to understand is how could esteemed AI researchers like LeCun and many others work for such a company to give it even more powers and edge? How can they justify this as scientists? The huge influx of money into research (here AI, but could be anything in the future) combined with the disfunctions of academia is very troubling.
-- Upton Sinclair (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upton_Sinclair)
Re: An Anti-Facebook Manifesto, by an Early Facebook Investor
#10What is there to be _done_? Pandora's box is open, so to speak. If Facebook disappeared overnight, are we really going to assume the problems they're in are going to go away?
Everyone is potentially connected to everyone, everywhere, on the entire planet. There has never been a technology so powerful as the centralized internet.
Furthermore, outside of media companies and the HN bubble, people _do not care_. Your average person doesn't care about decentralization, preventing social media addiction, gamification, or polarization of online communities.
To the contrary the market shows that companies like FB are massively successful.
So what are we to do? The world has been changed, drastically. Were we ready for it? And if we somehow were rid of Favebook, are we ready for what follows?