Fedora To Eventually Move to Wayland Too
osnews.com
Fedora To Eventually Move to Wayland Too
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: Fedora To Eventually Move to Wayland Too
#2I'll attest to that. Back in 1999/2000 when I had to administer a 500-700 element network using HPopenView over a 128 Kbit ISDN link, the performance was "OK", but nothing to write home about. If I had a lot of work to do, I was often tempted to just head into the office, and work there.
Then, Windows XP+Remote Desktop came in vogue, and the combination of Windows XP running the HummingBird Client (Exceed was the common X-Server at the time), accessed via RDP over ISDN, was actually a very successful combination.
Net-Net - While everyone talks about how great X-Windows is from a network-transparency perspective, I've always had more success with RDP - to the point of running it on my iPhone/iPad to manage my desktop at work. I'm not even sure if they make an X-Server for the iPhone. (Edit: of course they do - http://www.appstorehq.com/ix11-xserver-iphone-32068/app)
And VNC is just plain great as well - lots of competition in that ecosystem, and is hands down the most elegant solution to manage a couple dozen desktops running in VMware workstation for Windows.
So - Given that X-Windows has always been a bit "kludgy" for Desktop Apps (And I speak as one who has been using them for well over 10 years, sometimes on a daily basis for years at a stretch), and has never really been that super as a remote-access mechanism, has likely held back the adoption of Linux as a Desktop OS, AND will also likely be still supported even as Wayland starts to come on board - I say this is a GREAT announcement, and look forward to the community coming onboard and developing the Wayland ecosystem.
Re: Fedora To Eventually Move to Wayland Too
#3Yes, because the large market share of Desktop Linux is influential enough to get NVIDIA to bend to its will.
Re: Fedora To Eventually Move to Wayland Too
#4> NVIDIA may not have any plans to support it right now, but I'm pretty sure they eventually won't have much of a choice. Yes, because the large market share of Desktop Linux is influential enough to get NVIDIA to bend to its will.
Re: Fedora To Eventually Move to Wayland Too
#5Re: Fedora To Eventually Move to Wayland Too
#6From the article: "efficient remoting protocols do not look like X" I'll attest to that. Back in 1999/2000 when I had to administer a 500-700 element network using HPopenView over a 128 Kbit ISDN link, the performance was "OK", but nothing to write home about. If I had a lot of work to do, I was often tempted to just head into the office, and work there. Then, Windows XP+Remote Desktop came in vogue, and the combinat…
Re: Fedora To Eventually Move to Wayland Too
#7> NVIDIA may not have any plans to support it right now, but I'm pretty sure they eventually won't have much of a choice. Yes, because the large market share of Desktop Linux is influential enough to get NVIDIA to bend to its will.
There must be some reason why Nvidia released Linux drivers and if Wayland aligns with that reason, Nvidia will adapt.
Re: Fedora To Eventually Move to Wayland Too
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
There must be some reason why Nvidia released Linux drivers and if Wayland aligns with that reason, Nvidia will adapt.
Yes but I still find it kinda dumb that Nvidia is not involved in the decision making about the future of the Linux desktop, since they were the only ones which provided working drivers in the last years for Linux.
Re: Fedora To Eventually Move to Wayland Too
#9Finally, something good comes out of the CADT model. With a bit of luck, we'd get rid of the X Windows System in our own lifetime!