Live data from Hacker News

Nike’s auto-laced future

techcrunch.com

1–10 of 103 posts

Re: Nike’s auto-laced future

#4
Interesting topic. Like a lot of things, it's easy and enjoyable to unload some quick snark on Twitter, and certainly anything even related to IoT is a worthy target of all the snark we can muster 99.9% of the time.

On the other hand, the article points out that pro athletes have different needs than others, and these shoes (arguably!) address those needs in ways that other options do not. Also, the implementation isn't as dumb as the cynical might have assumed.

Re: Nike’s auto-laced future

#7
For me it's not overkill at all. It makes perfect sense on the safety/medical benefits alone. I walk two hours a day. In my prime I ran 5 miles or more/day and biked three times that. My feet pronate and I have to wear orthotic insoles.

For whatever reason I've never been able to keep my shoes stable. They either start too tight and have to be adjusted or are a little too lose, thus reducing ankle stability. I would welcome these on strictly utilitarian benefits. Since I spend $300 every six months on shoes that don't wreck what's left of my fallen arches, this would be a lateral move financially anyway, I suspect.

Re: Nike’s auto-laced future

#9
It's interesting to me that this gets lampooned, but the autolacing shoes in Back to the Future[1] (and the release of actual shoes a few years back[2]) was greeted with awe and cheers. Different crowds, maybe?

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28Wa5L-fkkM

[2] https://www.engadget.com/2016/10/05/nike-mag-first-look/

Re: Nike’s auto-laced future

#10

If you lose wifi will you be unable to take your shoe off ?

1) They use bluetooth, not wifi.

2) They're actually designed to work in situations where you don't even have your phone as a primary use case.

So no, of course not. That was actually a major point made early on in the article. If you'd even skimmed the article, you'd have seen the answer to your question. :)

Post reply on HN