Test Coverage is a Lie

#1

Post by smizell » Tue, Jan 15, 2019, 3:07 PM UTC

Test Coverage is a Lie
smizell.me

Re: Test Coverage is a Lie

#2

Post by jquast » Tue, Jan 15, 2019, 3:57 PM UTC

MC/DC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_condition/decision_co... addresses the given example.

Re: Test Coverage is a Lie

#3

Post by smizell » Tue, Jan 15, 2019, 4:01 PM UTC

jquast wrote: post #2

MC/DC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_condition/decision_co... addresses the given example.

Author here, great link—thanks! Do you know of any coverage tools that implement this?

Re: Test Coverage is a Lie

#4

Post by jquast » Tue, Jan 15, 2019, 6:15 PM UTC

smizell wrote: post #3

jquast wrote: post #2

MC/DC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_condition/decision_co... addresses the given example.

Author here, great link—thanks! Do you know of any coverage tools that implement this?

For C/C++, and various code generation from state description tools like matlab/simulink, specific in the auto/aircraft/safety industries, I won't mention by name here, but no FOSS.

Anyway, I think about this stuff all the time and really enjoyed your article, thanks for writing it, it doesn't seem to be a very popular topic to write in such depth. Thanks again!