Apple Open-Sources FoundationDB Record Layer
1–10 of 36 posts
Re: Apple Open-Sources FoundationDB Record Layer
#2HN Announcement comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18906341
Re: Apple Open-Sources FoundationDB Record Layer
#3Re: Apple Open-Sources FoundationDB Record Layer
#4Re: Apple Open-Sources FoundationDB Record Layer
#5I didn't expect this to be written in Java. Do they talk about this decision anywhere? I didn't catch anything in the announcement.
https://techcrunch.com/2015/03/24/apple-acquires-durable-dat...
Re: Apple Open-Sources FoundationDB Record Layer
#6I didn't expect this to be written in Java. Do they talk about this decision anywhere? I didn't catch anything in the announcement.
They acquired the company that made FoundationDB: https://techcrunch.com/2015/03/24/apple-acquires-durable-dat...
Re: Apple Open-Sources FoundationDB Record Layer
#7I didn't expect this to be written in Java. Do they talk about this decision anywhere? I didn't catch anything in the announcement.
The reason for Java being used here, if I had to guess, is they have experience running Java in production and the Java bindings are the most mature (in my opinion). Writing the record layer in C++ would probably be overkill. The reason the Java bindings are the most mature is probably because they needed to be to write this :)
Re: Apple Open-Sources FoundationDB Record Layer
#8Re: Apple Open-Sources FoundationDB Record Layer
#9I didn't expect this to be written in Java. Do they talk about this decision anywhere? I didn't catch anything in the announcement.