The Web Is Dead, Long Live the Web
humane.computer
The Web Is Dead, Long Live the Web
1–4 of 4 posts
Re: The Web Is Dead, Long Live the Web
#2the trouble developers have to support many browsers is because of the implementation variations.
a recent issue I had on Edge is that if the border color is #FFFFFFFF, it is rendered as black, but on other browsers, this is white.
What if the standard itself is defined as a common source code, and not owned by any company?
the standard implementation could be a dumb one without any hardware acceleration. It only needs to define the correct behavior. Any customized implementation has to conform to it.
Re: The Web Is Dead, Long Live the Web
#3I'm curious why can't the html standard be defined in form of source code (of a parser and a render), rather than human language. the trouble developers have to support many browsers is because of the implementation variations. a recent issue I had on Edge is that if the border color is #FFFFFFFF, it is rendered as black, but on other browsers, this is white. What if the standard itself is defined as a common source…
Re: The Web Is Dead, Long Live the Web
#4I'm curious why can't the html standard be defined in form of source code (of a parser and a render), rather than human language. the trouble developers have to support many browsers is because of the implementation variations. a recent issue I had on Edge is that if the border color is #FFFFFFFF, it is rendered as black, but on other browsers, this is white. What if the standard itself is defined as a common source…
An interesting idea! I think that was one of the original goals of the VPRI project ( http://vpri.org ) — very high-level executable specs that encoded the meaning rather than worried about performance. IIRC, their 2D graphics library was about 45 LOC ( https://raw.github.com/wiki/damelang/nile/socal.pdf )