Google and Facebook are monopolies. Does it matter? [audio]
innovationforallcast.com
Google and Facebook are monopolies. Does it matter? [audio]
1–10 of 128 posts
Re: Google and Facebook are monopolies. Does it matter? [audio]
#2Re: Google and Facebook are monopolies. Does it matter? [audio]
#3Traditional monopolies "control supply of a good or service, and where the entry of new producers is prevented or highly restricted."
In this case, the supply of a good or service (social networking, webpage indexing and searching) are not controlled by Facebook and Google because they aren't finite resources. Anyone can index the web and anyone can build a social network and Google/Facebook aren't going to crush you with lawsuits or some other nefarious tactic to maintain their position (AFAIK). Entry of new producers of these services is not prevented or highly restricted. New social networks and search engines pop up all the time.
What Facebook and Google have is massive, large scale user loyalty. Despite alternatives existing (Bing, Mastadon, DuckDuckGo, Myspace, etc.), users are voluntarily choosing to use Google and Facebook. This is not a monopoly, IMO.
I think we need a new term for this situation.
Re: Google and Facebook are monopolies. Does it matter? [audio]
#4Re: Google and Facebook are monopolies. Does it matter? [audio]
#5If they are, they are not a traditional monopolies. Traditional monopolies "control supply of a good or service, and where the entry of new producers is prevented or highly restricted." In this case, the supply of a good or service (social networking, webpage indexing and searching) are not controlled by Facebook and Google because they aren't finite resources. Anyone can index the web and anyone can build a social n…
Re: Google and Facebook are monopolies. Does it matter? [audio]
#6[deleted]
Re: Google and Facebook are monopolies. Does it matter? [audio]
#7Re: Google and Facebook are monopolies. Does it matter? [audio]
#8Re: Google and Facebook are monopolies. Does it matter? [audio]
#9If they are, they are not a traditional monopolies. Traditional monopolies "control supply of a good or service, and where the entry of new producers is prevented or highly restricted." In this case, the supply of a good or service (social networking, webpage indexing and searching) are not controlled by Facebook and Google because they aren't finite resources. Anyone can index the web and anyone can build a social n…
It’s kind of a rich get richer situation. The cost and difficulty of competing against Google for search, for example, requires just gigantic amounts of resources, time, and research. Meanwhile a Google has had all 3 of those for years and years now. To beat them at their own game requires much of the same thing, unless the answer isn’t based on crawling the web and attempting to parse natural language.