Nim – A Few Interesting Language Features
totallywearingpants.com
Nim – A Few Interesting Language Features
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Nim – A Few Interesting Language Features
#2I'm genuinely confused about why this could be considered a good idea?
Re: Nim – A Few Interesting Language Features
#3>Flexible Identifier Names I'm genuinely confused about why this could be considered a good idea?
Re: Nim – A Few Interesting Language Features
#4>Flexible Identifier Names I'm genuinely confused about why this could be considered a good idea?
Re: Nim – A Few Interesting Language Features
#5>Flexible Identifier Names I'm genuinely confused about why this could be considered a good idea?
I'm genuinely confused why it wouldn't. Too many arguments in programming deal with bikeshedding like camel case vs underscores. Why not eliminate the debate by agreeing it doesn't matter one bit?
Re: Nim – A Few Interesting Language Features
#6>Flexible Identifier Names I'm genuinely confused about why this could be considered a good idea?
Re: Nim – A Few Interesting Language Features
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm genuinely confused why it wouldn't. Too many arguments in programming deal with bikeshedding like camel case vs underscores. Why not eliminate the debate by agreeing it doesn't matter one bit?
It makes Ctrl-f and static analysis a bit harder!
Re: Nim – A Few Interesting Language Features
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm genuinely confused why it wouldn't. Too many arguments in programming deal with bikeshedding like camel case vs underscores. Why not eliminate the debate by agreeing it doesn't matter one bit?
It makes Ctrl-f and static analysis a bit harder!