Source for theguardian.com
github.com
Source for theguardian.com
1–10 of 104 posts
Re: Source for theguardian.com
#2Re: Source for theguardian.com
#3Re: Source for theguardian.com
#4Re: Source for theguardian.com
#5I don't always agree with their opinions or editorials, but I do respect the quality of the journalism and the fact that they are a non-profit [0]
I can't see more commercially-oriented paper/website open-sourcing any of their code, even if it's a (good imho) recruitment ploy.
[0] https://www.theguardian.com/the-scott-trust/2015/jul/26/the-...
Re: Source for theguardian.com
#6Re: Source for theguardian.com
#7[1] https://github.com/guardian/frontend/blob/88cfa609c73545085c...
Re: Source for theguardian.com
#8[1] https://github.com/guardian/frontend/blob/master/docs/99-arc...
Re: Source for theguardian.com
#9The Guardian has moved to a voluntary-subscription model for revenue - a gentle nagware if you like. No adblocker-blocking and (relatively) few actual adverts on the pages. I don't always agree with their opinions or editorials, but I do respect the quality of the journalism and the fact that they are a non-profit [0] I can't see more commercially-oriented paper/website open-sourcing any of their code, even if it's a…
https://github.com/nytimes
https://github.com/BostonGlobe
https://github.com/npr & https://github.com/nprapps
https://github.com/theatlantic
https://github.com/wsj
...
I really wish people wouldn't always assume the worst of the media. Especially when it takes about two seconds to verify (disprove) one's prejudice. I know one such post isn't going to have much of an effect. But considering every tangential mention of "mainstream media" brings out a thousand cynics, being an underpaid journalist trying to keep our society's discourse somewhat together must be endlessly frustrating.Plus, of course, it's just impossible to make informed decisions in a democracy when all trust in the media has been eroded by this hysteria.