Decentralized Identity Trilemma
maciek.blog
Decentralized Identity Trilemma
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: Decentralized Identity Trilemma
#2Re: Decentralized Identity Trilemma
#3Re: Decentralized Identity Trilemma
#4Some more discussion on the topic over here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4459113.0
I think the direction is right -- the solution probably lies in deriving scarcity from intelligence unique to the brain (for now).
Both brains and computers can perform pattern recognition. Computers are better at this task because they can be scaled and brains cannot. Therefore, this form of intelligence lies in the domain of financial capital. It can be abstracted through the cost of performing arithmetic operations (Proof-of-Work).
Brains can perform abstract thinking (answering the question why), computers cannot. If we could create a metric tied to the ability, it would be nested in the human capital.
I'm skeptical in regards to the practical application proposed in the thread. Even if this is robust, it'd be incredibly wasteful. The whole point of PoW is that it's moving computation from the brain onto a chip. This would go the other way around.
Re: Decentralized Identity Trilemma
#5Some more discussion on the topic over here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4459113.0