Understanding L1 Terminal Fault aka Foreshadow: What You Need to Know
1–10 of 119 posts
Re: Understanding L1 Terminal Fault aka Foreshadow: What You Need to Know
#2At which point do we agree the performance increases over the last 20 years have been built on sand and move elsewhere?
Re: Understanding L1 Terminal Fault aka Foreshadow: What You Need to Know
#32 months ago thread on OpenBSD and hyper-threading: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17350278
Re: Understanding L1 Terminal Fault aka Foreshadow: What You Need to Know
#4We're at a stage where to be safe on x86 we need to have multiple microcode and kernel layers to be safe. At which point do we agree the performance increases over the last 20 years have been built on sand and move elsewhere?
Re: Understanding L1 Terminal Fault aka Foreshadow: What You Need to Know
#5If hyper-threading should be disabled for maximum security, this is good for AMD CPUs which maximize cores per socket. 2 months ago thread on OpenBSD and hyper-threading: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17350278
Re: Understanding L1 Terminal Fault aka Foreshadow: What You Need to Know
#6If hyper-threading should be disabled for maximum security, this is good for AMD CPUs which maximize cores per socket. 2 months ago thread on OpenBSD and hyper-threading: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17350278
Or just keep using AMD CPUs, because yet again they are unaffected https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/security-updates
Re: Understanding L1 Terminal Fault aka Foreshadow: What You Need to Know
#7We're at a stage where to be safe on x86 we need to have multiple microcode and kernel layers to be safe. At which point do we agree the performance increases over the last 20 years have been built on sand and move elsewhere?
Re: Understanding L1 Terminal Fault aka Foreshadow: What You Need to Know
#8We're at a stage where to be safe on x86 we need to have multiple microcode and kernel layers to be safe. At which point do we agree the performance increases over the last 20 years have been built on sand and move elsewhere?
Move where exactly? At this point x86 is the least of all evils that have respectable performance.
That's why alternatives like Open POWER are important.
Re: Understanding L1 Terminal Fault aka Foreshadow: What You Need to Know
#9We're at a stage where to be safe on x86 we need to have multiple microcode and kernel layers to be safe. At which point do we agree the performance increases over the last 20 years have been built on sand and move elsewhere?
It's also time for a computer system with one and only one general purpose processor (no tiny CPUs in storage or "system management" or every other device)
Probably something like a programming language/OS/computer system written new with a CPU based on current GPU designs.
Re: Understanding L1 Terminal Fault aka Foreshadow: What You Need to Know
#10Google Cloud
- Google Cloud's protections against this new vulnerability: - https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/gcp/protecting-agains...)
- GCE Related information: - https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/security-bulletins
- GKE Related information: - https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/security-bul...
Oracle Cloud
- https://blogs.oracle.com/oraclesecurity/intel-l1tf
Azure
- https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/virtualization/2018/08/1...