Live data from Hacker News

I don't trust Signal

drewdevault.com

1–10 of 473 posts

Re: I don't trust Signal

#2
I trust it more than unencrypted SMS or Facebook Messenger.

I trust it less than p2p chat over an encrypted network I control with layered defense in depth.

Security is not a boolean.

Re: I don't trust Signal

#4

Is there a preference of Telegram over Signal or vice versa?

Telegram doesn't use end-to-end encryption by default and likely never will. Paul Durov has been quite hostile against that feature in the past. So yes, choose Signal over Telegram.

I find that instead of trying to convince friends/family to use Signal I just tell them "use Signal as your default SMS app" or install it myself for them. This tactic worked well in the Internet Explorer/Firefox and then Chrome transitions, so I don't see why it can't work again.

Then whenever I will be chatting with them, it won't matter if they try to send me a SMS, as long as I use Signal, their messages will be encrypted, as they will be data messages. I wouldn't trust the default SMS app/Android Messages not to steal your SMS texts anyway, especially on Chinese phones.

Also, I can't wait until the Matrix-based Riot gets its redesign:

https://medium.com/@RiotChat/a-sneak-peek-at-a-whole-new-rio...

Re: I don't trust Signal

#7

Is there a preference of Telegram over Signal or vice versa?

Telegram doesn't have end-to-end encryption by default (only in secret chats).

That's all you need to understand to know that it's an inferior product in comparison to Signal.

Re: I don't trust Signal

#9

Is there a preference of Telegram over Signal or vice versa?

I use Telegram, mainly because the UI is extremely superior. It also allows bots and has a desktop client.

Tried to use Signal, but it was buggy and slow in comparison. I also trust Telegram much more than Facebook/Whatsapp.

Post reply on HN