An integer formula for Fibonacci numbers (2015)
blog.paulhankin.net
An integer formula for Fibonacci numbers (2015)
1–10 of 20 posts
Re: An integer formula for Fibonacci numbers (2015)
#2Re: An integer formula for Fibonacci numbers (2015)
#3Now you're really gonna' piss the interviewers off! http://joelgrus.com/2016/05/23/fizz-buzz-in-tensorflow/
Edit: I actually tried a FizzBuzz myself and I actually like it. I get why people were to ask it at interviews since it does require you to think for a second (if you haven't done it before) so you can easily filter out people who can't think
Re: An integer formula for Fibonacci numbers (2015)
#4Re: An integer formula for Fibonacci numbers (2015)
#5Now you're really gonna' piss the interviewers off! http://joelgrus.com/2016/05/23/fizz-buzz-in-tensorflow/
I'm tempted to resurrect the code (I still have a printout) and use it to implement Fizz Buzz....
Re: An integer formula for Fibonacci numbers (2015)
#6Now you're really gonna' piss the interviewers off! http://joelgrus.com/2016/05/23/fizz-buzz-in-tensorflow/
Neat text. I'd be really impressed if I were to interview him, but then again: I'd never ask someone to write a fizzbuzz... hmmm... Edit: I actually tried a FizzBuzz myself and I actually like it. I get why people were to ask it at interviews since it does require you to think for a second (if you haven't done it before) so you can easily filter out people who can't think
[1] https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
Re: An integer formula for Fibonacci numbers (2015)
#7Now you're really gonna' piss the interviewers off! http://joelgrus.com/2016/05/23/fizz-buzz-in-tensorflow/
Many many years ago I did a project building a functional programming language that macro expanded into lambda calculus that was then compiled down to SK combinators for evaluation. This was entertainingly inefficient. I'm tempted to resurrect the code (I still have a printout) and use it to implement Fizz Buzz....
[1]: https://www.jtolio.com/2017/03/whiteboard-problems-in-pure-l...
Re: An integer formula for Fibonacci numbers (2015)
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
Neat text. I'd be really impressed if I were to interview him, but then again: I'd never ask someone to write a fizzbuzz... hmmm... Edit: I actually tried a FizzBuzz myself and I actually like it. I get why people were to ask it at interviews since it does require you to think for a second (if you haven't done it before) so you can easily filter out people who can't think
Indeed, what's the point to ask someone to write a fizzbuzz when it's already been done to the highest of professional enterprise standards! [1] [1] https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
Re: An integer formula for Fibonacci numbers (2015)
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Neat text. I'd be really impressed if I were to interview him, but then again: I'd never ask someone to write a fizzbuzz... hmmm... Edit: I actually tried a FizzBuzz myself and I actually like it. I get why people were to ask it at interviews since it does require you to think for a second (if you haven't done it before) so you can easily filter out people who can't think
Indeed, what's the point to ask someone to write a fizzbuzz when it's already been done to the highest of professional enterprise standards! [1] [1] https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
Re: An integer formula for Fibonacci numbers (2015)
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Indeed, what's the point to ask someone to write a fizzbuzz when it's already been done to the highest of professional enterprise standards! [1] [1] https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
I'm gonna need a write up. I've been looking at the code for 10 or 15 minutes and I still haven't found "fizz", "buzz", or the number 100 anywhere in the code. It's amazing.