Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
1–10 of 172 posts
Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#2Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#3Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#4nobody is going to call them out on this blatant lie?
Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#5I'm interested to see how they go about filtering VPN traffic. AFAIK, running openvpn over port 443 is pretty much indistinguishable from normal TLS traffic.
Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#6I'm interested to see how they go about filtering VPN traffic. AFAIK, running openvpn over port 443 is pretty much indistinguishable from normal TLS traffic.
Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#7Child 1 - "Let's tax people for being on social media to stop them from saying bad things about us" Child 2 - "Yeah that's a great idea. Plus we'll have more money for candy." Govenments notice - "Social media is hereby taxed. Your local ISP will be collecting the tax automatically." People - "Whatever, we'll just use VPN" Government Screams- "AND NO VPNs ALLOWED!"
So much for free speech.
Good luck stopping the tor network.
Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#8I'm interested to see how they go about filtering VPN traffic. AFAIK, running openvpn over port 443 is pretty much indistinguishable from normal TLS traffic.
OpenVPN running over port 443 is generally going to be using a CA that is not a public CA, and issues certificates directly rather than through an intermediate.
Even if you tunnel something over normal TLS, the type of traffic can potentially be determined by analyzing how much data flows in which direction and when.
If circumvention is seen as too widely spread, Uganda may simply decide that all TLS traffic leaving the country must be intercepted by a MitM proxy, and require everyone to trust their CA.
I'm sure there are plenty of companies that would be happy to get the contract to provide this service.
These blocks can often be circumvented by methods that do not scale, but if only tech savvy people who can afford to run their own VPN server on a VPS somewhere can circumvent the block, it's "mission accomplished".
Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#9I'm interested to see how they go about filtering VPN traffic. AFAIK, running openvpn over port 443 is pretty much indistinguishable from normal TLS traffic.