Live data from Hacker News

Nothingtoinstall.com now live

joelonsoftware.com

1–10 of 14 posts

Re: Nothingtoinstall.com now live

#2
Maybe I don't get it, but this seems like a truly horrible name. I didn't have an idea of what the site was for from the name and even reading Joel's post left it a little vague. Once I was there, I got a feel for what was going on, but I still don't think I will remember the place.

For a site aimed at users, why use a name referring to webapp distribution?

Re: Nothingtoinstall.com now live

#3
post #2

Maybe I don't get it, but this seems like a truly horrible name. I didn't have an idea of what the site was for from the name and even reading Joel's post left it a little vague. Once I was there, I got a feel for what was going on, but I still don't think I will remember the place. For a site aimed at users, why use a name referring to webapp distribution?

The site is a Q/A forum for web apps.

Re: Nothingtoinstall.com now live

#4
post #2

Maybe I don't get it, but this seems like a truly horrible name. I didn't have an idea of what the site was for from the name and even reading Joel's post left it a little vague. Once I was there, I got a feel for what was going on, but I still don't think I will remember the place. For a site aimed at users, why use a name referring to webapp distribution?

I thought it made sense... well as much as "stackoverflow" does.

Re: Nothingtoinstall.com now live

#6
post #2

Maybe I don't get it, but this seems like a truly horrible name. I didn't have an idea of what the site was for from the name and even reading Joel's post left it a little vague. Once I was there, I got a feel for what was going on, but I still don't think I will remember the place. For a site aimed at users, why use a name referring to webapp distribution?

Agreed. Especially when something like WebAppAnswers.com remains unregistered. Selecting good domains is a dying art.

Re: Nothingtoinstall.com now live

#8
post #2

Maybe I don't get it, but this seems like a truly horrible name. I didn't have an idea of what the site was for from the name and even reading Joel's post left it a little vague. Once I was there, I got a feel for what was going on, but I still don't think I will remember the place. For a site aimed at users, why use a name referring to webapp distribution?

The name is bad. When I first saw the headline here on hn, my first thought was "portable apps" followed by "live linux cd's."

Re: Nothingtoinstall.com now live

#9
post #2

Maybe I don't get it, but this seems like a truly horrible name. I didn't have an idea of what the site was for from the name and even reading Joel's post left it a little vague. Once I was there, I got a feel for what was going on, but I still don't think I will remember the place. For a site aimed at users, why use a name referring to webapp distribution?

webapps.stackexchange.com seems like it would be a better name to me. Not so sure why they'd want to not continue to use subdomains of stackexchange.com.

Re: Nothingtoinstall.com now live

#10
post #2

Maybe I don't get it, but this seems like a truly horrible name. I didn't have an idea of what the site was for from the name and even reading Joel's post left it a little vague. Once I was there, I got a feel for what was going on, but I still don't think I will remember the place. For a site aimed at users, why use a name referring to webapp distribution?

It was the highest voted domain name by the community http://meta.nothingtoinstall.com/questions/108/what-should-o...
Post reply on HN