Live data from Hacker News

Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) Release Candidate

releases.ubuntu.com

1–10 of 126 posts

Re: Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) Release Candidate

#4

This release uses a new interface font, which is the first major OS (that I know of, anyways) to not use a Helvetica-like font for their GUI. Mark Shuttleworth talks about the decision and impact on his blog: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/537

screenshots: http://www.webupd8.org/2010/09/ubuntu-1010-maverick-meerkat-...

Re: Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) Release Candidate

#6

This release uses a new interface font, which is the first major OS (that I know of, anyways) to not use a Helvetica-like font for their GUI. Mark Shuttleworth talks about the decision and impact on his blog: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/537

The font is available on the CD, but it has not been set as default (and it might not be default in the final release either).

Re: Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) Release Candidate

#8

This release uses a new interface font, which is the first major OS (that I know of, anyways) to not use a Helvetica-like font for their GUI. Mark Shuttleworth talks about the decision and impact on his blog: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/537

How's Lucida Grande Helvetica-like?

Re: Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) Release Candidate

#9
post #4

This release uses a new interface font, which is the first major OS (that I know of, anyways) to not use a Helvetica-like font for their GUI. Mark Shuttleworth talks about the decision and impact on his blog: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/537

screenshots: http://www.webupd8.org/2010/09/ubuntu-1010-maverick-meerkat-...

Release candidate screenshots: http://www.webupd8.org/2010/09/ubuntu-1010-maverick-meerkat-...

Re: Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) Release Candidate

#10

This release uses a new interface font, which is the first major OS (that I know of, anyways) to not use a Helvetica-like font for their GUI. Mark Shuttleworth talks about the decision and impact on his blog: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/537

Macintosh prior to OSX used Chicago and Charcoal. These are fairly distinctive and aren't really "Helvetica-like" in my mind. Chicago in particular was pretty much synonymous with "Macintosh" and was used in early iPods. Pre-MacOS machines used fixed-width bitmapped fonts that fall more in the range of "programmer fonts" than Helvetica.
Post reply on HN