Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try
mobile.nytimes.com
Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try
1–10 of 753 posts
Re: Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try
#2Re: Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try
#3(Chrome has no solution for containing accounts across tabs, last I checked. You have to spawn entire new Chrome instances.)
Re: Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try
#4Re: Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try
#5Re: Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try
#6And there is only one thing which I don't like — high CPU usage compared to chrome. It makes my old MacBook air very noisy because of the fan spinning. When I use chrome it's completely silent.
Re: Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try
#7Firefox permanently broke Pentadactyl. I'm really not going to be excited about Firefox until it has something of that caliber again.
Re: Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try
#8Firefox permanently broke Pentadactyl. I'm really not going to be excited about Firefox until it has something of that caliber again.
Re: Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try
#9Firefox permanently broke Pentadactyl. I'm really not going to be excited about Firefox until it has something of that caliber again.
Re: Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try
#10Firefox permanently broke Pentadactyl. I'm really not going to be excited about Firefox until it has something of that caliber again.
Don't mean to discredit or invalidate your feelings, I just feel the need to disclaim that it's impossible to meet people's need with that granularity.
The alternative is that they keep XUL, make 0.1% of the install base happy, and ditch the performance increases that Quantum/WebExtension have given us... at which point there wouldn't be a NYT article and we'd all just be stuck in a browser monoculture.