Twitter meets TensorFlow
blog.twitter.com
Twitter meets TensorFlow
1–10 of 73 posts
Re: Twitter meets TensorFlow
#2One that wants to manipulate your mind, one that echochambers your discovery, one that censors arbitrarily.
Re: Twitter meets TensorFlow
#3Re: Twitter meets TensorFlow
#4> Machine learning enables Twitter to drive engagement, surface content most relevant to our users, and promote healthier conversations. One that wants to manipulate your mind, one that echochambers your discovery, one that censors arbitrarily.
Re: Twitter meets TensorFlow
#5> Machine learning enables Twitter to drive engagement, surface content most relevant to our users, and promote healthier conversations. One that wants to manipulate your mind, one that echochambers your discovery, one that censors arbitrarily.
I dare say they’re acting well outside of their wheelhouse. Their job is to provide a platform for discussion, not whatever that mess of corpspeak I just read is.
Re: Twitter meets TensorFlow
#6- Regular blog.twitter.com/engineering reader
Re: Twitter meets TensorFlow
#7> Machine learning enables Twitter to drive engagement, surface content most relevant to our users, and promote healthier conversations. One that wants to manipulate your mind, one that echochambers your discovery, one that censors arbitrarily.
One that wants to manipulate your mind
Like your post here? Or my present reply to it? And so on...
one that echochambers your discovery
Which is good, because nobody has enough time in the day to process every conceivable byte of information they might stumble across...
one that censors arbitrarily
OK, because while everyone may have the right to speak freely, not all speech needs to be heard by everyone...
Re: Twitter meets TensorFlow
#8> Machine learning enables Twitter to drive engagement, surface content most relevant to our users, and promote healthier conversations. One that wants to manipulate your mind, one that echochambers your discovery, one that censors arbitrarily.
Just to play Devil's advocate: One that wants to manipulate your mind Like your post here? Or my present reply to it? And so on... one that echochambers your discovery Which is good, because nobody has enough time in the day to process every conceivable byte of information they might stumble across... one that censors arbitrarily OK, because while everyone may have the right to speak freely, not all speech needs to b…
With Twitter, FB, and modern social media, they let their algorithm decide what I should see. They think they know what people want and ultimately what's best for me. I disagree with this so I opt-out of their services. Sadly. Because there are ( or were ) a lot of interesting and novel voices on there.
Also, I suppose at a certain point those 3XXX employees need to justify their existence.
And yes it's their prerogative to do whatever they want with their product. And yes I know private companies are not bound by the 1st Amendment.
Re: Twitter meets TensorFlow
#9> Machine learning enables Twitter to drive engagement, surface content most relevant to our users, and promote healthier conversations. One that wants to manipulate your mind, one that echochambers your discovery, one that censors arbitrarily.
I’m not even sort of interested in what Twitter’s heavy-handed definition of “healthy conversations” are. I dare say they’re acting well outside of their wheelhouse. Their job is to provide a platform for discussion, not whatever that mess of corpspeak I just read is.
What better way than program a robot to decide what 'healthy conversations' are.
Dorsey's capitulation to the complaint army over his recent chicken sandwich says it all.
I do see the hate mobs calming down ( or being ignored ), eventually, but when that happens we know Dorsey and a lot of these CEOs have little or no backbone.
Re: Twitter meets TensorFlow
#10> Machine learning enables Twitter to drive engagement, surface content most relevant to our users, and promote healthier conversations. One that wants to manipulate your mind, one that echochambers your discovery, one that censors arbitrarily.
Turns out it's not.