It’s Time for a New Discussion of Marijuana’s Risks
1–10 of 26 posts
Re: It’s Time for a New Discussion of Marijuana’s Risks
#2Given its potential harm as well as benefits in health, it’s worthwhile that people in general as well as proponents for liberalization, myself included, know more about all its effects. We as a population would be better served if there were a middle ground between it’s and evil gateway drug and it’s a cure to many ailments and should not be regulated.
Re: It’s Time for a New Discussion of Marijuana’s Risks
#3Re: It’s Time for a New Discussion of Marijuana’s Risks
#4Re: It’s Time for a New Discussion of Marijuana’s Risks
#5It’s fair to say that if we think smoke in general is deleterious to respiratory health and many chemical compounds found in different kinds of smoke are known carcinogens that marijuana is not exempt from those troublesome characteristics. Given its potential harm as well as benefits in health, it’s worthwhile that people in general as well as proponents for liberalization, myself included, know more about all its e…
Whereas tobacco is ridiculously deleterious and causes oxidative damage directly iirc.
I used to think it was all about smoke inhalation but it’s not that simple.
That being said, obviously I agree that we need to study the effects of cannabis as much as possible.
Re: It’s Time for a New Discussion of Marijuana’s Risks
#6Whatever the risks of marijuana are, they pale in comparison of the harm done by the "War on Drugs" aka the "War on Poor People and Minorities". Anything that takes power away from the criminal "justice" system to lock up people for non violent offenses, I'm all for it.
Re: It’s Time for a New Discussion of Marijuana’s Risks
#7tl;dr; according to the author's "Irresponsible Utilitarian Analysis," the statistically dominant factor in whether widely-legalized marijuana would be a net benefit or harm to society is its impact on driving. Since cars are, for most of us, the most dangerous thing in our lives, this probably makes a decent amount of sense.
Re: It’s Time for a New Discussion of Marijuana’s Risks
#8It’s fair to say that if we think smoke in general is deleterious to respiratory health and many chemical compounds found in different kinds of smoke are known carcinogens that marijuana is not exempt from those troublesome characteristics. Given its potential harm as well as benefits in health, it’s worthwhile that people in general as well as proponents for liberalization, myself included, know more about all its e…
I disagree. If you read the literature you will find cannabis smoke, physically, is stunningly non-harmful and not associated with much more than perhaps a slightly higher chance of respiratory infection. Whereas tobacco is ridiculously deleterious and causes oxidative damage directly iirc. I used to think it was all about smoke inhalation but it’s not that simple. That being said, obviously I agree that we need to s…
That's about all the science on MJ smoke (vs vapor etc) that I really need to know.
Re: It’s Time for a New Discussion of Marijuana’s Risks
#9Whatever the risks of marijuana are, they pale in comparison of the harm done by the "War on Drugs" aka the "War on Poor People and Minorities". Anything that takes power away from the criminal "justice" system to lock up people for non violent offenses, I'm all for it.
The war on drugs has destroyed many lives of people in majorities as well, from poor all the way up to wealthy. This doesn't have to be a divisive issue. It's a human issue.
Re: It’s Time for a New Discussion of Marijuana’s Risks
#10It’s fair to say that if we think smoke in general is deleterious to respiratory health and many chemical compounds found in different kinds of smoke are known carcinogens that marijuana is not exempt from those troublesome characteristics. Given its potential harm as well as benefits in health, it’s worthwhile that people in general as well as proponents for liberalization, myself included, know more about all its e…
I disagree. If you read the literature you will find cannabis smoke, physically, is stunningly non-harmful and not associated with much more than perhaps a slightly higher chance of respiratory infection. Whereas tobacco is ridiculously deleterious and causes oxidative damage directly iirc. I used to think it was all about smoke inhalation but it’s not that simple. That being said, obviously I agree that we need to s…