Vapor 3.0.0 released - Swift web framework
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: Vapor 3.0.0 released - Swift web framework
#2When Swift was first released as open source the potential for using it server-side felt really intriguing, it's great to see how far along the community has come in such a fairly short time!
Re: Vapor 3.0.0 released - Swift web framework
#3Re: Vapor 3.0.0 released - Swift web framework
#4In their own benchmark, Vapor is about as quick Gin, written in Go.
Looking at Techempower's latest web framework comparison [0], we see that Gin reaches only 27% the requests per second of the quickest tested framework, and 28% of the quickest framework written in Go.
[0] http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r15&hw=p...
Re: Vapor 3.0.0 released - Swift web framework
#5Re: Vapor 3.0.0 released - Swift web framework
#6Do you need a Mac to use this? The getting started guide says you need Xcode.
Re: Vapor 3.0.0 released - Swift web framework
#7I simplify it as an easier Rust that comes with an official REPL.
Re: Vapor 3.0.0 released - Swift web framework
#8I'm sure this is great software and as quick as anyone needs, but their empty body plaintext benchmark leaves a bad taste. It's not just that with an empty body the results are even less relevant than typical "Hello World" benchmarks. It's the other frameworks that they picked: In their own benchmark, Vapor is about as quick Gin, written in Go. Looking at Techempower's latest web framework comparison [0], we see that…
That test says nothing about real world performance though, that's true. The db read and write benchmarks are more useful.
Re: Vapor 3.0.0 released - Swift web framework
#9I'm sure this is great software and as quick as anyone needs, but their empty body plaintext benchmark leaves a bad taste. It's not just that with an empty body the results are even less relevant than typical "Hello World" benchmarks. It's the other frameworks that they picked: In their own benchmark, Vapor is about as quick Gin, written in Go. Looking at Techempower's latest web framework comparison [0], we see that…