I am leaving llvm
lists.llvm.org
I am leaving llvm
1–10 of 145 posts
Re: I am leaving llvm
#2I grew up in a time and place where many took great steps to profess that they were the "good" people and to ensure that everyone knew that they appropriately despised the "bad" people (albeit with love). I will not be a part of a return to that.
Re: I am leaving llvm
#3 The community change I cannot take is how the social injustice
movement has permeated it. When I joined llvm no one asked or cared
about my religion or political view. We all seemed committed to just
writing a good compiler framework.
This makes me sad.Re: I am leaving llvm
#4More interestingly, being a gay man doesn't qualify you (but being a trans-gender man does). So gay man are not considered worthy of special attention.
Re: I am leaving llvm
#5Re: I am leaving llvm
#6I just want to work with smart people. I don't care what gender they associate themselves with, what color they are, whether there's an equal distribution of any of these characteristics in my department. I just want to do my job and learn from smart people. Why can't it be as simple as that?
Re: I am leaving llvm
#7Ridiculous. This is the kind of weak thinker who would have looked at Jim Crow's South and said it was egalitarian. Formal discrimination is not the same as concrete discrimination.
The drive for “inclusion” is turning cancerous. “Social justice bikeshedding”. I’m pro social tolerance, but it’s coming off the rails in the tech world, with active discrimination explained away as progress.
Re: I am leaving llvm
#8Re: I am leaving llvm
#9The community change I cannot take is how the social injustice movement has permeated it. When I joined llvm no one asked or cared about my religion or political view. We all seemed committed to just writing a good compiler framework. This makes me sad.
> https://www.outreachy.org/apply/eligibility/
To which I say... really? Ok, that's too bad that you don't want to be a contributor anymore because there is a diversity scholarship... somehow I don't see that as a long term problem for LLVM though.