In 2004, Zuckerberg Broke Into a Facebook User's Private Email Account (2010)
1–10 of 134 posts
Re: In 2004, Zuckerberg Broke Into a Facebook User's Private Email Account (2010)
#2[deleted]
Re: In 2004, Zuckerberg Broke Into a Facebook User's Private Email Account (2010)
#3He will be given a free pass because, as a jew, it is expected that he is morally challenged.
Jews aren't given work that requires integrity.
This is why.
Re: In 2004, Zuckerberg Broke Into a Facebook User's Private Email Account (2010)
#4Facebook’s response to this story is revealing:
> "We’re not going to debate the disgruntled litigants and anonymous sources who seek to rewrite Facebook’s early history or embarrass Mark Zuckerberg with dated allegations. The unquestioned fact is that since leaving Harvard for Silicon Valley nearly six years ago, Mark has led Facebook's growth from a college website to a global service playing an important role in the lives of over 400 million people."
You get a similar argument in the recently leaked ‘Boz memo’: please ignore our unethical behavior, instead focus on how many users we have. Growth at any cost is justified.
Re: In 2004, Zuckerberg Broke Into a Facebook User's Private Email Account (2010)
#5Facebook’s response to this story is revealing: > "We’re not going to debate the disgruntled litigants and anonymous sources who seek to rewrite Facebook’s early history or embarrass Mark Zuckerberg with dated allegations. The unquestioned fact is that since leaving Harvard for Silicon Valley nearly six years ago, Mark has led Facebook's growth from a college website to a global service playing an important role in t…
> growth at any cost is justified.
... captured in the infamous phrase "Move Fast and Break Things"
Re: In 2004, Zuckerberg Broke Into a Facebook User's Private Email Account (2010)
#6First time I'm hearing about this. Wow. Thanks for posting. Was there never a criminal in investigation?
Re: In 2004, Zuckerberg Broke Into a Facebook User's Private Email Account (2010)
#7Facebook’s response to this story is revealing: > "We’re not going to debate the disgruntled litigants and anonymous sources who seek to rewrite Facebook’s early history or embarrass Mark Zuckerberg with dated allegations. The unquestioned fact is that since leaving Harvard for Silicon Valley nearly six years ago, Mark has led Facebook's growth from a college website to a global service playing an important role in t…
> growth at any cost is justified. ... captured in the infamous phrase "Move Fast and Break Things"
Big If Things == Law
Re: In 2004, Zuckerberg Broke Into a Facebook User's Private Email Account (2010)
#8Facebook’s response to this story is revealing: > "We’re not going to debate the disgruntled litigants and anonymous sources who seek to rewrite Facebook’s early history or embarrass Mark Zuckerberg with dated allegations. The unquestioned fact is that since leaving Harvard for Silicon Valley nearly six years ago, Mark has led Facebook's growth from a college website to a global service playing an important role in t…
[deleted]
Re: In 2004, Zuckerberg Broke Into a Facebook User's Private Email Account (2010)
#9Yeahh we need regulations on Facebook. The fact that he retains a majority voting share in the company, the fact that I now have zero trust in Zuckerberg AND Sandberg into doing the right thing, AND that there is no viable competition/users are too psychologically entwined to make the decision to detach from Facebook means the only checks and balances left against this unscrupulous individual is the US government. Unfortunately 80% are in his pockets, but that's the best bet we have.
What's stopping him from using his master access to obtain any info he needs for a presidential election? Trust? Trusting him?
Re: In 2004, Zuckerberg Broke Into a Facebook User's Private Email Account (2010)
#10Yeahh we need regulations on Facebook. The fact that he retains a majority voting share in the company, the fact that I now have zero trust in Zuckerberg AND Sandberg into doing the right thing, AND that there is no viable competition/users are too psychologically entwined to make the decision to detach from Facebook means the only checks and balances left against this unscrupulous individual is the US government. Un…
[deleted]