Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Review my Startup - jotOnce.com

news.ycombinator.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

1–10 of 12 posts

Re: Ask HN: Review my Startup - jotOnce.com

#3

Post by vyrotek »

Simple. Clean. Works.

But, I'm still not sure when I would use it. I saw on http://jotonce.com/about/ a few use cases but I can't say that I've ever needed something encrypted. This is basically an encrypted etherpad right?

Also, what is the difference between a 'passphrase' for a notepad and just a custom url key? Anyone can just type in things and try to guess the passphrase. Is it really any more secure than what other online notepads did with unique urls?

Re: Ask HN: Review my Startup - jotOnce.com

#4

Post by SageRaven »

I like the idea, though I can't fathom how I'd actually use it in day-to-day life.

Looks like an interesting mechanism for spam (much like URL shortening) and clandestine communications. My 2nd and 3rd "jots" (that's even catchier than "tweets") were GPG-encrypted messages with an MD5 hash for the password.

Site layout is clean and slick.

I think it has potential.

Re: Ask HN: Review my Startup - jotOnce.com

#6

Post by doctorosdeck »

vyrotek wrote: post #3

Simple. Clean. Works. But, I'm still not sure when I would use it. I saw on http://jotonce.com/about/ a few use cases but I can't say that I've ever needed something encrypted. This is basically an encrypted etherpad right? Also, what is the difference between a 'passphrase' for a notepad and just a custom url key? Anyone can just type in things and try to guess the passphrase. Is it really any more secure than what…

Yea you can just try to guess the passphrase, but if you want to make it harder you can always use a passphrase + the last 4 digits of their phone number under options. The difference between the passphrase and the custom url key is that at least for me a passphrase is alot easier to pass along. Just telling someone the password is 'house' and them having to put in their phone number is easier to pass along to a non-technical person then a custom url.

Re: Ask HN: Review my Startup - jotOnce.com

#7

Post by drcode »

Yes, this has potential. Here are some frustrations I had with the UI though:

I didn't "have a passphrase given to me" yet so I didn't know what to do from the homepage. The text "free and no sign-ups" in the corner needs to somehow be visible even without mouse hover, IMHO, otherwise visitors will think they need a beta passphrase to proceed.

This is supposed to be super-secure, but the password suggestion was "stone", which is very insecure.

There are too many options available (yes, even though there aren't that many :) Somehow, you need to organize the options into different "work flows" that are easier to understand. After clicking "create new jot" maybe you could show a menu with the following options: 1. High Security & For one recipient: Here's where you put the "phone" feature (and maybe other options where people can type in their email address, zip code, etc) 2. High Security & Lengthy Password: Here's you generate a super long/secure password for people (which they can replace with their own) 3. Low Security & Easy To Distribute: Here's where you suggest a password that's just a simple dictionary word

Those are my suggestions.

Re: Ask HN: Review my Startup - jotOnce.com

#8

Post by doctorosdeck »

drcode wrote: post #7

Yes, this has potential. Here are some frustrations I had with the UI though: I didn't "have a passphrase given to me" yet so I didn't know what to do from the homepage. The text "free and no sign-ups" in the corner needs to somehow be visible even without mouse hover, IMHO, otherwise visitors will think they need a beta passphrase to proceed. This is supposed to be super-secure, but the password suggestion was "ston…

Thanks alot, I like the idea about work flows. I'll see what we can do to try an incorporate those in

Re: Ask HN: Review my Startup - jotOnce.com

#9

Post by doctorosdeck »

drcode wrote: post #7

Yes, this has potential. Here are some frustrations I had with the UI though: I didn't "have a passphrase given to me" yet so I didn't know what to do from the homepage. The text "free and no sign-ups" in the corner needs to somehow be visible even without mouse hover, IMHO, otherwise visitors will think they need a beta passphrase to proceed. This is supposed to be super-secure, but the password suggestion was "ston…

With regards to the insecure password, the password itself is supposed to be simple, something you can easily tell someone that will stick in their head. Under options you can also enter the last 4 digits of the recipients phone number for added security. But it's not necessarily meant as a way to keep people out, if thats what you want to do you can always set a much longer password.
Post reply on HN