Bringing AMP to Gmail
blog.google
Bringing AMP to Gmail
1–10 of 144 posts
Re: Bringing AMP to Gmail
#2Thanks, mutt, for sparing me all this pain.
Re: Bringing AMP to Gmail
#3Re: Bringing AMP to Gmail
#4Google (and recently, Outlook) is taking all of it away. It's putting mail from people not on your contact list in spam[^3]; it's by default blaclisting IPs within certain range[^2]; now it's bringing it's own format as well.
Is this embrace, extend, extinguish, Google style?
[^1]: let's not get into the problem of DNS never really being owned, only rented, for now
[^2]: https://wiki.hetzner.de/index.php/Microsoft_Blacklist/en
[^3]: only experienced it, friends did as well, but I don't have proof.
Re: Bringing AMP to Gmail
#5Re: Bringing AMP to Gmail
#6Google is trying to turn Gmail into a platform.
Re: Bringing AMP to Gmail
#7Re: Bringing AMP to Gmail
#8No, no, no. Google is trying to turn Gmail into a platform.
Re: Bringing AMP to Gmail
#9The strategy of Google / AMP is clear: using its monopoly to convert the open web into properties of Google.
AMP is as “open” as Adobe Flash (Flex, etc) is open. Sure, it may he open source, but it is encumbered by license keys (see: AMP Cache), special privileges (again see: Google search cache), and development totally in control by Google.
Re: Bringing AMP to Gmail
#10What really are the long term motivations for Google to promote and push AMP so much?