C Plus Equality (A Feminist Programming Language)
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: C Plus Equality (A Feminist Programming Language)
#2Well this is probably the greatest thing I think I've seen all year so far. The hello world example is priceless and for some reason #consider instead of #include cracked me up. Bahahaha and this:
Constants are not allowed, as the idea of a lack of identity fluidity is problematic. Additionally, if one constant were larger than another, that would privilege the larger one over the smaller one. As such, any numeric value is a variable, and is required to take on at least 2 values over the course of the program, or the interpreter will throw a Trigger Warning.
Re: C Plus Equality (A Feminist Programming Language)
#3"After birth, a program rolls for a 40% chance of executing literally as the code is written, 40% of being "psychoanalytically incompatible", and 40% of executing by a metaphorical epistemology the order of the functions found in main()."
hilarious!
Re: C Plus Equality (A Feminist Programming Language)
#4Well this is probably the greatest thing I think I've seen all year so far. The hello world example is priceless and for some reason #consider instead of #include cracked me up. Bahahaha and this: Constants are not allowed, as the idea of a lack of identity fluidity is problematic. Additionally, if one constant were larger than another, that would privilege the larger one over the smaller one. As such, any numeric va…
ENDMISOGYNY
Re: C Plus Equality (A Feminist Programming Language)
#5This is what happens when a LtU member is fucking sick of San Francisco's shit.