Imposter Syndrome (in Data Science)
brohrer.github.io
Imposter Syndrome (in Data Science)
1–10 of 13 posts
Re: Imposter Syndrome (in Data Science)
#2Re: Imposter Syndrome (in Data Science)
#3I have no DS background, am a humble engineer but believe it's 10x better to just work with whatever you have available and get sit done.
Re: Imposter Syndrome (in Data Science)
#4This describes my situation to the point. I have worked in big unicorns and have deployed many ml based models in production which had moved the numbers significantly while many a data scientists in our team just kept cribbing about errors in data or scarcity of it. I have no DS background, am a humble engineer but believe it's 10x better to just work with whatever you have available and get sit done.
Re: Imposter Syndrome (in Data Science)
#5Data science is one of the most imposter-filled "professions". It's a recently-established category of worker that falls across multiple disciplines and is very effected by technological progress. I have met "data scientists" who aren't really good at any aspect of it, but they still get by because of the supply/demand and lack of any existing expertise to say "hey, you know, this person we hired is barely competent…
We will distinguish 'machine learning specialist data scientist' from 'database specialist data scientist' just like we distinguish 'electrical engineer' from 'lab systems engineer', for example.
Then, we might have a term for generalists like 'data science technician'. And by then, the people who 'aren't really good at any aspect of it' and can't really function as generalists will be naturally sorted out because they can't really fit into any of those titles
Re: Imposter Syndrome (in Data Science)
#6...although I have met a few genius data scientists who seemingly really can do everything. Although I'm pretty sure they are paid upwards of 300k.
Re: Imposter Syndrome (in Data Science)
#7As a data scientist I have wondered if this field is particularly suited to imposter syndrome. My formal background is economics, and every once in a while I become terrified at how little formal statistics I've studied, or large gaps in data structures etc. although I'm similarly surprised at how far I've gone by just going home and studying the basics when I run into something I don't know, and the gaps in knowledg…
So for instance, I totally feel like a data science imposter, but in the last year have done the following: - Pushed a custom deep learning NLP model to production - Created and maintain company's ETL and data warehouse mechanisms - Performed statistical analyses to find ways to better target and increase customer engagement. - Implemented event tracking and performance metrics across products - A sales prediction product that has contributed to $~5M in incremental revenue
Somebody obviously believes in me since I've grown the team from just myself to ~6, but I also know that I've had dozens of past colleagues that would instantly disqualify me since I 1) don't have a PhD and/or 2) can't/don't read statistics/machine learning papers
Re: Imposter Syndrome (in Data Science)
#8As a data scientist I have wondered if this field is particularly suited to imposter syndrome. My formal background is economics, and every once in a while I become terrified at how little formal statistics I've studied, or large gaps in data structures etc. although I'm similarly surprised at how far I've gone by just going home and studying the basics when I run into something I don't know, and the gaps in knowledg…
Combine with the value that good ones can provide, and you have a perfect situation where a boss or peer just thinks thar be dragons in the work sphere of the statistician.
Re: Imposter Syndrome (in Data Science)
#9http://partiallyderivative.com/podcast/2017/03/06/badasses-f...
Re: Imposter Syndrome (in Data Science)
#10Data science is one of the most imposter-filled "professions". It's a recently-established category of worker that falls across multiple disciplines and is very effected by technological progress. I have met "data scientists" who aren't really good at any aspect of it, but they still get by because of the supply/demand and lack of any existing expertise to say "hey, you know, this person we hired is barely competent…
All this means is that we will inevitably reach a point where separate titles are used, and 'data scientist' will means about as much as 'engineer'. We will distinguish 'machine learning specialist data scientist' from 'database specialist data scientist' just like we distinguish 'electrical engineer' from 'lab systems engineer', for example. Then, we might have a term for generalists like 'data science technician'.…