Machine Learning for Systems and Systems for Machine Learning [pdf]
1–10 of 50 posts
Re: Machine Learning for Systems and Systems for Machine Learning [pdf]
#2Re: Machine Learning for Systems and Systems for Machine Learning [pdf]
#3Re: Machine Learning for Systems and Systems for Machine Learning [pdf]
#4Re: Machine Learning for Systems and Systems for Machine Learning [pdf]
#5That "Learned Index Structures" makes it pretty clear that Karpathy was right in his widely criticized "Software 2.0" piece.
Re: Machine Learning for Systems and Systems for Machine Learning [pdf]
#6Re: Machine Learning for Systems and Systems for Machine Learning [pdf]
#7That's a heck of a performance boost for a chip that's likely costing google way less than the nvidia flagship.
[1] http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-titan-v-110-teraflop...
Re: Machine Learning for Systems and Systems for Machine Learning [pdf]
#8Nvidia Titan V can do 110 TFLOPS, 12GB of 1.7 Gb/s Memory [1] and sells for 3,000$. TPU v2 does 180 TFLOPS, 64GB of 19.2Gb/s Memory [2]. That's a heck of a performance boost for a chip that's likely costing google way less than the nvidia flagship. [1] http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-titan-v-110-teraflop...
Re: Machine Learning for Systems and Systems for Machine Learning [pdf]
#9Nvidia Titan V can do 110 TFLOPS, 12GB of 1.7 Gb/s Memory [1] and sells for 3,000$. TPU v2 does 180 TFLOPS, 64GB of 19.2Gb/s Memory [2]. That's a heck of a performance boost for a chip that's likely costing google way less than the nvidia flagship. [1] http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-titan-v-110-teraflop...
Designing and taping out a new ASIC isn't cheap.
Presumably Google needs to use a fairly recent process (22nm or better?), which means GlobalFoundaries/TSMC or Samsung (do any of the Chinese native fabs have 22nm yet?). I wonder who us building them?
So many questions...
Re: Machine Learning for Systems and Systems for Machine Learning [pdf]
#10That "Learned Index Structures" makes it pretty clear that Karpathy was right in his widely criticized "Software 2.0" piece.