Live data from Hacker News

Miller’s Law – A Rule in Product Design and Life Management

blog.prototypr.io

1–10 of 63 posts

Re: Miller’s Law – A Rule in Product Design and Life Management

#3
You know how people say: “on a scale of 1-10”?

I’ve used the principle of Millers law to start asking people to measure on a scale of 1-7.

Universally, people balk at the scale. But I explain to them that most people can’t tell the difference between 2 and 3 on a ten point scale. If you can’t articulate a difference, there’s no use in the measurement.

Seven is great because you get more than the simplicity of 1-5. So... 1 - the worst 2 - bad 3 - below avg 4 - average 5 - above average 6 - good 7 - the best.

And don’t even THINK about responding with “5.5”. ;)

Re: Miller’s Law – A Rule in Product Design and Life Management

#4

You know how people say: “on a scale of 1-10”? I’ve used the principle of Millers law to start asking people to measure on a scale of 1-7. Universally, people balk at the scale. But I explain to them that most people can’t tell the difference between 2 and 3 on a ten point scale. If you can’t articulate a difference, there’s no use in the measurement. Seven is great because you get more than the simplicity of 1-5. So…

[deleted]

Re: Miller’s Law – A Rule in Product Design and Life Management

#5
Tangential, but I was able to recite all the words, but only because memorized them in a nonsensical, but easier to remember story. I like the exercise because it forces me to be creative.

The CAT looked at me eating an APPLE, I threw a BALL outside to see if it would chase it instead it climbed a TREE...

Re: Miller’s Law – A Rule in Product Design and Life Management

#6

You know how people say: “on a scale of 1-10”? I’ve used the principle of Millers law to start asking people to measure on a scale of 1-7. Universally, people balk at the scale. But I explain to them that most people can’t tell the difference between 2 and 3 on a ten point scale. If you can’t articulate a difference, there’s no use in the measurement. Seven is great because you get more than the simplicity of 1-5. So…

There is research into this - your intuition is pretty much in line with best practices (though 7 isn’t magic compared to 5 or anything). Eg http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.839...

Re: Miller’s Law – A Rule in Product Design and Life Management

#7

You know how people say: “on a scale of 1-10”? I’ve used the principle of Millers law to start asking people to measure on a scale of 1-7. Universally, people balk at the scale. But I explain to them that most people can’t tell the difference between 2 and 3 on a ten point scale. If you can’t articulate a difference, there’s no use in the measurement. Seven is great because you get more than the simplicity of 1-5. So…

This is very close to one of the key criticisms behind Net Promoter Score when we was looking at implementing it for a client.

Basically it uses an 11 point scale and your net promoter score is the proportion of 0-6 (negatives) subtracted from the positives (8 or 9-10). I may have got ranges wrong but the idea is the same. This was touted as "the only number you need to improve" for business success.

Re: Miller’s Law – A Rule in Product Design and Life Management

#10
post #5

Tangential, but I was able to recite all the words, but only because memorized them in a nonsensical, but easier to remember story. I like the exercise because it forces me to be creative. The CAT looked at me eating an APPLE, I threw a BALL outside to see if it would chase it instead it climbed a TREE...

Me, too. Instead of having to remember all 20 words, I just had to remember a few stories: the cat eating an apple on a ball in a tree, the square face whose house is a boxcar, etc.
Post reply on HN