Mir’s hiring
community.ubuntu.com
Mir’s hiring
1–10 of 13 posts
Re: Mir’s hiring
#2Uh, what? I thought they dumped Mir for Wayland when they switched back to Gnome.
Re: Mir’s hiring
#3Working on a space station. Sounds cool.
Re: Mir’s hiring
#4Uh, what? I thought they dumped Mir for Wayland when they switched back to Gnome.
This indicates they're making it a drop-in replacement.
Re: Mir’s hiring
#5Dunno if this is a good value propositon since the layoffs for the people that were working on Unity.
Re: Mir’s hiring
#6If you want reinventing the wheel 24/7 - this job is for you!
Re: Mir’s hiring
#7ehhh..... Really
Re: Mir’s hiring
#8Uh, what? I thought they dumped Mir for Wayland when they switched back to Gnome.
This indicates they're making it a drop-in replacement. https://community.ubuntu.com/t/mir-architecture/467/4
From that link: Once Mir’s support for Wayland clients is on a par with the support for “native” Mir clients we will likely phase out support for the latter.
Does that mean they want to phase out Mir once they have a full Wayland display server? I thought the whole point for them was to continue to support those that are already using Mir? This still doesn't make any sense to me.
I thought one of the original distinctions was that Mir was going to work with the old closed-source nVidia driver, while Wayland insisted on doing it the "right" way and made nVidia catch up instead of pandering to them. Other than that, I've never heard anything to justify Mir's existence. Why not just start with an existing Wayland server that supports all the features and move on? They'll reach the end goal faster.
I'm not trying to be negative, but if the end goal is to be a Wayland display server then why is it so hard to let Mir die? Is it just pride? Separation Anxiety? ;-) j.k. but really what is it?
Re: Mir’s hiring
#9Working on a space station. Sounds cool.
One that was certainly cool at the time, but has since burned up and was superseded by a collaborative effort. :p
Re: Mir’s hiring
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
This indicates they're making it a drop-in replacement. https://community.ubuntu.com/t/mir-architecture/467/4
From that link: Once Mir’s support for Wayland clients is on a par with the support for “native” Mir clients we will likely phase out support for the latter. Does that mean they want to phase out Mir once they have a full Wayland display server? I thought the whole point for them was to continue to support those that are already using Mir? This still doesn't make any sense to me. I thought one of the original distinc…
What existing wayland server? Gnome and KDE has it's own, there was not a generic server when Mir announced support for Wayland and from what I know some people are working on creating a library that can be used for creating compositors, Mir is a solution for DEs like Mate because it would be easy to work on using Mir as a server so gaining wayland support then doing a compositor from scratch or using a library.