RCN is much more data efficient than traditional Deep Neural Networks
1–10 of 56 posts
Re: RCN is much more data efficient than traditional Deep Neural Networks
#2Featuring some of the worst typography I've seen on the internet. There clearly was an attempt, but just leaving font-face as default would've been more readable.
Re: RCN is much more data efficient than traditional Deep Neural Networks
#3Featuring some of the worst typography I've seen on the internet. There clearly was an attempt, but just leaving font-face as default would've been more readable.
I'll typically be the last to comment on a webpage typography (usually to a fault) but this site here actually gives me a headache to try and read.
Re: RCN is much more data efficient than traditional Deep Neural Networks
#4I'd love to read this, but the faint text on white background... good god. I went through the code looking to change the background so I could read it and found this:
body { text-rendering: optimizeLegibility; }
Ok
Re: RCN is much more data efficient than traditional Deep Neural Networks
#5I'd love to read this, but the faint text on white background... good god. I went through the code looking to change the background so I could read it and found this: body { text-rendering: optimizeLegibility; } Ok
if you untick [font-family: "ObjektivMk1-Thin"; */] it does the job.
Re: RCN is much more data efficient than traditional Deep Neural Networks
#6I'd love to read this, but the faint text on white background... good god. I went through the code looking to change the background so I could read it and found this: body { text-rendering: optimizeLegibility; } Ok
Right? I just '* {font-family: Arial}'ed it and it made it a lot better.
Re: RCN is much more data efficient than traditional Deep Neural Networks
#7I'd love to read this, but the faint text on white background... good god. I went through the code looking to change the background so I could read it and found this: body { text-rendering: optimizeLegibility; } Ok
Came here to say this. Sent them a contact message hopefully they'll do some A/B testing and notice all the new attention they're getting.
Re: RCN is much more data efficient than traditional Deep Neural Networks
#8Is RCN more of a CNN alternative most useful to image-related tasks or could also work well to other types of neural networks?
ps: thanks god for Reader mode on Safari
Re: RCN is much more data efficient than traditional Deep Neural Networks
#9I only skimmed over the article, but I think the title on HN does not reflect the claims the authors are making.
The title of the paper is: A generative vision model that trains with high data efficiency and breaks text-based CAPTCHAs
The title of the article is: Common Sense, Cortex, and CAPTCHA
That's nowhere near the sensationalist title at HN: RCN is much more data efficient than traditional Deep Neural Networks
Re: RCN is much more data efficient than traditional Deep Neural Networks
#10[deleted]