Security advisory for crates.io
users.rust-lang.org
Security advisory for crates.io
1–10 of 17 posts
Re: Security advisory for crates.io
#2If you follow the link to the security announcement list, you can see the one other advisory we've had since 1.0 as well.
Re: Security advisory for crates.io
#3Re: Security advisory for crates.io
#4before the precaution fix this was a legal archive:
$crate_name-$crate_version/outside -> ../
$crate_name-$crate_version/outside/$other_crate-$other-version/blah/blah
then you have this code:https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/4493/files#diff-ce3a...
tar.unpack(dst.parent().unwrap())?;
so while Archive#unpack protects you against following symlinks outside of `dst` (which is a really good default!) it doesn't protect you from following symlinks inside of `dst` so presumably you can use the symlink trick to overwrite other packages.i haven't tested this so this could be wrong :/ like maybe archive by default doesn't create symlinks or reorders the extraction so symlinks are always created last.
Re: Security advisory for crates.io
#5Re: Security advisory for crates.io
#62017-09-13 @ 19:19 - Justin sends mail to security@rust-lang.org about this
2017-09-13 @ 19:28 - response sent to Justin acknowledging the vulnerability
2017-09-13 @ 21:14 - a patch to crates.io was finished, all current tarballs verified not-malicious
Re: Security advisory for crates.io
#7I cannot read this security advisory because I don't allow third-party JS. No punchline.
(With Javascript disabled, that page still renders, so I'm not sure why it doesn't show for you.)
Re: Security advisory for crates.io
#8I cannot read this security advisory because I don't allow third-party JS. No punchline.
If you subscribe to rustlang-security-announcements@googlegroups.com , you'll get emails. No JS required there. (With Javascript disabled, that page still renders, so I'm not sure why it doesn't show for you.)
The difference is probably that selective blockers like uBlock/uMatrix don't show elements, while globaly disabling Javascript does, and discourse might be relying on the noscript element (on mobile right now, so I can't check to be sure).
Re: Security advisory for crates.io
#9the response time of the rust team was extremely quick, great job! 2017-09-13 @ 19:19 - Justin sends mail to security@rust-lang.org about this 2017-09-13 @ 19:28 - response sent to Justin acknowledging the vulnerability 2017-09-13 @ 21:14 - a patch to crates.io was finished, all current tarballs verified not-malicious
Re: Security advisory for crates.io
#10As always: there are no silver bullets. Static typing, nor Rust, can save you from all bugs. If you follow the link to the security announcement list, you can see the one other advisory we've had since 1.0 as well.