List of common misconceptions
en.wikipedia.org
List of common misconceptions
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: List of common misconceptions
#2http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1465001
I usually do a quick google search of HN before posting, e.g.:
"site:news.ycombinator.com common misconceptions"Re: List of common misconceptions
#3duplicate from two weeks ago: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1465001 I usually do a quick google search of HN before posting, e.g.: "site:news.ycombinator.com common misconceptions"
Re: List of common misconceptions
#4duplicate from two weeks ago: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1465001 I usually do a quick google search of HN before posting, e.g.: "site:news.ycombinator.com common misconceptions"
It's weird how Wikipedia says a page has been "redirected" from an alias, yet no redirection actually occurs (in the typical HTTP sense). If it did, dupes could easily be avoided by storing the final, canonical URL.
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=site:en.wikipedia.org+%s&btnI=SearchRe: List of common misconceptions
#5A serious question: Do you ever verify citations? Or do you just assume that since there is one, the article is probably correct?
Re: List of common misconceptions
#6Another common misconception is that Wikipedia is a good place to get reliable facts. A serious question: Do you ever verify citations? Or do you just assume that since there is one, the article is probably correct?
I recently spent a several hours trying to find correct information about some hardware, all the while running into incorrect information copied and pasted from a wikipedia article.
I eventually found the information, but almost all the top search results from google and yahoo (and even duckduckgo) pointed to the inaccurate wikipedia information, most times pasted verbatim and passed off as truth.