A Muslim PhD student gets targeted as a security risk; now he wants to know why
features.crosscut.com
A Muslim PhD student gets targeted as a security risk; now he wants to know why
1–10 of 58 posts
Re: A Muslim PhD student gets targeted as a security risk; now he wants to know why
#2Re: A Muslim PhD student gets targeted as a security risk; now he wants to know why
#3The reason is very clear and simple: because he is a Muslim and terrorist attacks by Muslims are very common nowadays. The real question is how far are we willing to go to prevent terror attacks. Are we willing to let innocent people get harassed on a regular basis?
Re: A Muslim PhD student gets targeted as a security risk; now he wants to know why
#4The reason is very clear and simple: because he is a Muslim and terrorist attacks by Muslims are very common nowadays. The real question is how far are we willing to go to prevent terror attacks. Are we willing to let innocent people get harassed on a regular basis?
Apparently (as I literally learned right now via a Google search), this is a thing: http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/200...
Re: A Muslim PhD student gets targeted as a security risk; now he wants to know why
#5Re: A Muslim PhD student gets targeted as a security risk; now he wants to know why
#6The reason is very clear and simple: because he is a Muslim and terrorist attacks by Muslims are very common nowadays. The real question is how far are we willing to go to prevent terror attacks. Are we willing to let innocent people get harassed on a regular basis?
You don't seem to be surprised by the content of the article. May I ask what your stance is on the issue of further marginalizing Muslims living in America? I am a Tunisian-American Muslim by the way.
Re: A Muslim PhD student gets targeted as a security risk; now he wants to know why
#7The reason is very clear and simple: because he is a Muslim and terrorist attacks by Muslims are very common nowadays. The real question is how far are we willing to go to prevent terror attacks. Are we willing to let innocent people get harassed on a regular basis?
Re: A Muslim PhD student gets targeted as a security risk; now he wants to know why
#8The reason is very clear and simple: because he is a Muslim and terrorist attacks by Muslims are very common nowadays. The real question is how far are we willing to go to prevent terror attacks. Are we willing to let innocent people get harassed on a regular basis?
You don't seem to be surprised by the content of the article. May I ask what your stance is on the issue of further marginalizing Muslims living in America? I am a Tunisian-American Muslim by the way.
Re: A Muslim PhD student gets targeted as a security risk; now he wants to know why
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don't seem to be surprised by the content of the article. May I ask what your stance is on the issue of further marginalizing Muslims living in America? I am a Tunisian-American Muslim by the way.
It like saying you have to eat only at Mcdonald's and its unhealthy for you. Everyone would like to complain about that, unless there is no food and you're starving...then McDonald's seems like a more reasonable solution.
There are two other problems with this mindset. The first is that objectively quantifying the benefit vs. downside of marginalizing a particular group doesn't happen. Instead, feelings and opinions seep in -- a fear of the "other", if you will. The second is that, by marginalizing a group, you more often that not end up making your problem worse.
The "other way" is to try to understand the root causes behind such attacks, and work with the communities that are closest; in this case, Muslim communities around America. It's quite known by now that American Muslims are very willing to cooperate with authorities when the need arises.
Re: A Muslim PhD student gets targeted as a security risk; now he wants to know why
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
It like saying you have to eat only at Mcdonald's and its unhealthy for you. Everyone would like to complain about that, unless there is no food and you're starving...then McDonald's seems like a more reasonable solution.
The biggest problem I see with this kind of argument is that once you enable the explicit and outright marginalization of a particular group, it becomes essentially impossible to ensure that it stays limited to said group. See: "First they came...". There are two other problems with this mindset. The first is that objectively quantifying the benefit vs. downside of marginalizing a particular group doesn't happen. Ins…
We don't see radical Buddhist bombing things?