Live data from Hacker News

Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index

digiconomist.net

1–10 of 295 posts

Re: Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index

#4
The reward for mining a block will go down over time. In the end, all mining will be financed via the transaction fees. Then the market will figure out how much energy should be used per transaction.

Re: Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index

#7
Long term outlook for mining isn't good. Ethereum, for example, is moving toward Proof of Stake (https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/Proof-of-Stake-FAQ), and Bitcoin will become less profitable for miners soon, beginning with the activation of Segwit.

The reason for the recent Bitcoin Cash fork, was that miners are terrified of losing control given the substantial investment required to maintain profitability. I don't think Satoshi ever thought mining would become so profitable, centralized, and political. If Satoshi had, he or she may have rethought the mining aspect of Bitcoin.

It's the end of days for mining as we know it.

Re: Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index

#9
Apparently "terawatt-hours per year" is a unit that people use in public policy, but it strikes me as strange. Converting 16.22 TWh/year to a "more metric" unit, that's a sustained power usage of 1.85 gigawatts.

So Bitcoin is constantly using more than enough power to make Doc Brown's eyes bug out.

Post reply on HN