Google blocked every one of the WSWS’s 45 top search terms
1–10 of 151 posts
Re: Google blocked every one of the WSWS’s 45 top search terms
#2That's probably ... correct.
Re: Google blocked every one of the WSWS’s 45 top search terms
#3>The WSWS has been blacklisted in searches dealing with history, and in particular historical topics related to the revolutionary struggles of the 20th century. These include the terms “Russian revolution,” “Bolshevik revolution” and “October revolution,” all of which returned results in the top 50 in April That's probably ... correct.
Re: Google blocked every one of the WSWS’s 45 top search terms
#4But it was probably naive to assume Google would limit itself to censoring political opinions with which one disagrees.
Re: Google blocked every one of the WSWS’s 45 top search terms
#5>The WSWS has been blacklisted in searches dealing with history, and in particular historical topics related to the revolutionary struggles of the 20th century. These include the terms “Russian revolution,” “Bolshevik revolution” and “October revolution,” all of which returned results in the top 50 in April That's probably ... correct.
Blaming their own SEO failure to censorship. Sounds pretty left to me.
Re: Google blocked every one of the WSWS’s 45 top search terms
#6Quite a claim.
Re: Google blocked every one of the WSWS’s 45 top search terms
#7>The WSWS has been blacklisted in searches dealing with history, and in particular historical topics related to the revolutionary struggles of the 20th century. These include the terms “Russian revolution,” “Bolshevik revolution” and “October revolution,” all of which returned results in the top 50 in April That's probably ... correct.
Re: Google blocked every one of the WSWS’s 45 top search terms
#8>The WSWS has been blacklisted in searches dealing with history, and in particular historical topics related to the revolutionary struggles of the 20th century. These include the terms “Russian revolution,” “Bolshevik revolution” and “October revolution,” all of which returned results in the top 50 in April That's probably ... correct.
None of it seems to be conspiracy theory or low-quality material.