The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science
theglobeandmail.com
The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science
1–10 of 684 posts
Re: The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science
#2Re: The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science
#3Debate me instead of downvoting please. Downvoting is like forfeiting a discussion and shows that you question your own narrative.
Re: The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science
#4To people who are flagging this article: why don't you read it? It's important, and the author is competent.
Re: The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science
#5The key to changing minds is understanding the other side. Not shutting them out of the conversation.
Re: The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science
#6Re: The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science
#7EDIT: 2 minutes in and I'm already being downvoted. Stop being sexists, stop oppressing me
Re: The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science
#8To people who are flagging this article: why don't you read it? It's important, and the author is competent.
Re: The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science
#9Please don't flag the article if you simply disagree. The key to changing minds is understanding the other side. Not shutting them out of the conversation.
Re: The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science
#10It's no different from doing the same but replacing gender with race - it's racist no matter how carefully and scientifically you worded it.
It's almost as if the person writing this article believes that if the manifesto is factually/scientifically correct then it must somehow not be sexist. As if sexism consisted of lies? I don't get it.