Live data from Hacker News

The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science

theglobeandmail.com

1–10 of 684 posts

Re: The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science

#3
I fail to understand how a memo calling for MORE diversity can get headlined as "anti-diversity memo" on all big media outlets. Do journalists even do independent research anymore or are they just regurgitating whatever reuters send their way without scrutiny?

Debate me instead of downvoting please. Downvoting is like forfeiting a discussion and shows that you question your own narrative.

Re: The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science

#10
Why can't the memo be both sexist and science? Arguing that there are differences between genders that make one gender unsuitable for a task can be as scientific as you want, it's still sexist.

It's no different from doing the same but replacing gender with race - it's racist no matter how carefully and scientifically you worded it.

It's almost as if the person writing this article believes that if the manifesto is factually/scientifically correct then it must somehow not be sexist. As if sexism consisted of lies? I don't get it.

Post reply on HN