Resurrecting a Dragon
source.opennews.org
Resurrecting a Dragon
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Resurrecting a Dragon
#2More descriptive title: Making a 3D reconstruction of a very well preserved nodosaur fossil for National Geographic.
Re: Resurrecting a Dragon
#3More descriptive title: Making a 3D reconstruction of a very well preserved nodosaur fossil for National Geographic.
Or: Using basic computergraphics to display a nodosaur 3D model
Re: Resurrecting a Dragon
#4More descriptive title: Making a 3D reconstruction of a very well preserved nodosaur fossil for National Geographic.
It was very misleading. I eagerly clicked on the article expecting genetic research... cloning a dinosaur using a common ancestor or something.
Re: Resurrecting a Dragon
#5More descriptive title: Making a 3D reconstruction of a very well preserved nodosaur fossil for National Geographic.
It was very misleading. I eagerly clicked on the article expecting genetic research... cloning a dinosaur using a common ancestor or something.
Why is this down voted?
I was gonna give the article a skip then I thought "What if they actually engineered a dinosaur into existence", felt I had to click it just in case.
Instead I got an, albeit interesting, article about 3D.
Re: Resurrecting a Dragon
#6More descriptive title: Making a 3D reconstruction of a very well preserved nodosaur fossil for National Geographic.
It was very misleading. I eagerly clicked on the article expecting genetic research... cloning a dinosaur using a common ancestor or something.
It was the same for me. I was expecting cool biotechnology, found web programming.
Re: Resurrecting a Dragon
#7Here not be dragons. :(